Soft and hard models of human resource management

a reappraisal

Catherine Truss, Lynda Gratton, Veronica Hope Hailey, Patrick McGovern, Philip Stiles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

155 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two of the most widely adopted models of human resource management are the hard and soft versions. These are based on opposing views of human nature and managerial control strategies. The hard model is based on notions of tight strategic control, and an economic model of man according to Theory X, while the soft model is based on control through commitment and Theory Y. We argue that because these assumptions are so divergent, they cannot both properly be incorporated within a single model of human resource management.

Eight in-depth case-studies were carried out, involving questionnaires, interviews and focus groups in order to find out whether organizations were practising either form of HRM. We found that no pure examples of either form existed. The paper concludes that the rhetoric adopted by the companies frequently embraces the tenets of the soft, commitment model, while the reality experienced by employees is more concerned with strategic control, similar to the hard model. This distinction between rhetoric and reality needs to be taken into account in conceptualizations of human resource management.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-73
JournalJournal of management studies
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1997

Fingerprint

Human resource management
Personnel
Economics

Cite this

Soft and hard models of human resource management : a reappraisal. / Truss, Catherine; Gratton, Lynda; Hope Hailey, Veronica; McGovern, Patrick; Stiles, Philip.

In: Journal of management studies, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 53-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Truss, Catherine ; Gratton, Lynda ; Hope Hailey, Veronica ; McGovern, Patrick ; Stiles, Philip. / Soft and hard models of human resource management : a reappraisal. In: Journal of management studies. 1997 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 53-73.
@article{18305b0398974cdf94a96fe3b29d6575,
title = "Soft and hard models of human resource management: a reappraisal",
abstract = "Two of the most widely adopted models of human resource management are the hard and soft versions. These are based on opposing views of human nature and managerial control strategies. The hard model is based on notions of tight strategic control, and an economic model of man according to Theory X, while the soft model is based on control through commitment and Theory Y. We argue that because these assumptions are so divergent, they cannot both properly be incorporated within a single model of human resource management.Eight in-depth case-studies were carried out, involving questionnaires, interviews and focus groups in order to find out whether organizations were practising either form of HRM. We found that no pure examples of either form existed. The paper concludes that the rhetoric adopted by the companies frequently embraces the tenets of the soft, commitment model, while the reality experienced by employees is more concerned with strategic control, similar to the hard model. This distinction between rhetoric and reality needs to be taken into account in conceptualizations of human resource management.",
author = "Catherine Truss and Lynda Gratton and {Hope Hailey}, Veronica and Patrick McGovern and Philip Stiles",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-6486.00042",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "53--73",
journal = "Journal of management studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soft and hard models of human resource management

T2 - a reappraisal

AU - Truss, Catherine

AU - Gratton, Lynda

AU - Hope Hailey, Veronica

AU - McGovern, Patrick

AU - Stiles, Philip

PY - 1997/1

Y1 - 1997/1

N2 - Two of the most widely adopted models of human resource management are the hard and soft versions. These are based on opposing views of human nature and managerial control strategies. The hard model is based on notions of tight strategic control, and an economic model of man according to Theory X, while the soft model is based on control through commitment and Theory Y. We argue that because these assumptions are so divergent, they cannot both properly be incorporated within a single model of human resource management.Eight in-depth case-studies were carried out, involving questionnaires, interviews and focus groups in order to find out whether organizations were practising either form of HRM. We found that no pure examples of either form existed. The paper concludes that the rhetoric adopted by the companies frequently embraces the tenets of the soft, commitment model, while the reality experienced by employees is more concerned with strategic control, similar to the hard model. This distinction between rhetoric and reality needs to be taken into account in conceptualizations of human resource management.

AB - Two of the most widely adopted models of human resource management are the hard and soft versions. These are based on opposing views of human nature and managerial control strategies. The hard model is based on notions of tight strategic control, and an economic model of man according to Theory X, while the soft model is based on control through commitment and Theory Y. We argue that because these assumptions are so divergent, they cannot both properly be incorporated within a single model of human resource management.Eight in-depth case-studies were carried out, involving questionnaires, interviews and focus groups in order to find out whether organizations were practising either form of HRM. We found that no pure examples of either form existed. The paper concludes that the rhetoric adopted by the companies frequently embraces the tenets of the soft, commitment model, while the reality experienced by employees is more concerned with strategic control, similar to the hard model. This distinction between rhetoric and reality needs to be taken into account in conceptualizations of human resource management.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00042

U2 - 10.1111/1467-6486.00042

DO - 10.1111/1467-6486.00042

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 53

EP - 73

JO - Journal of management studies

JF - Journal of management studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 1

ER -