Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer

a systematic review

A M Willis, S K Smith, B Meiser, M L Ballinger, D M Thomas, M-A Young

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence suggests that a significant proportion of individuals referred to cancer genetic counselling (GC) do not attend, and thus may not be engaged in adequate cancer risk management. We aimed to review the literature to better understand barriers to accessing GC and how they may be overcome. We conducted a systematic literature search for articles examining factors influencing cancer GC uptake as well as motivators and barriers to GC attendance. Factors were categorised as sociodemographic, psychosocial or clinical. The literature search identified 1413 citations, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. GC uptake ranged from 19% to 88%. With the exceptions of education level, socioeconomic status, cancer-specific distress, personal cancer diagnosis and actual and perceived risk of cancer, support was lacking for most sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial factors as predictors of GC uptake. Cost and logistical barriers, emotional concerns, family concerns and low perceived personal relevance were reported as important considerations for those declining GC. We conclude that there is poor understanding of GC and a lack of decision support among those referred to GC. Research into ways of providing education and support to referred individuals will be important as the scope and availability of GC and genetic testing broaden.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-133
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Genetics
Volume92
Issue number2
Early online date19 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Genetic Counseling/psychology
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Social Class

Cite this

Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer : a systematic review. / Willis, A M; Smith, S K; Meiser, B; Ballinger, M L; Thomas, D M; Young, M-A.

In: Clinical Genetics, Vol. 92, No. 2, 08.2017, p. 121-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Willis, A M ; Smith, S K ; Meiser, B ; Ballinger, M L ; Thomas, D M ; Young, M-A. / Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer : a systematic review. In: Clinical Genetics. 2017 ; Vol. 92, No. 2. pp. 121-133.
@article{4c0e271c8fbe453a8b920db22be5591e,
title = "Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer: a systematic review",
abstract = "Evidence suggests that a significant proportion of individuals referred to cancer genetic counselling (GC) do not attend, and thus may not be engaged in adequate cancer risk management. We aimed to review the literature to better understand barriers to accessing GC and how they may be overcome. We conducted a systematic literature search for articles examining factors influencing cancer GC uptake as well as motivators and barriers to GC attendance. Factors were categorised as sociodemographic, psychosocial or clinical. The literature search identified 1413 citations, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. GC uptake ranged from 19{\%} to 88{\%}. With the exceptions of education level, socioeconomic status, cancer-specific distress, personal cancer diagnosis and actual and perceived risk of cancer, support was lacking for most sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial factors as predictors of GC uptake. Cost and logistical barriers, emotional concerns, family concerns and low perceived personal relevance were reported as important considerations for those declining GC. We conclude that there is poor understanding of GC and a lack of decision support among those referred to GC. Research into ways of providing education and support to referred individuals will be important as the scope and availability of GC and genetic testing broaden.",
keywords = "Genetic Counseling/psychology, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Neoplasms/diagnosis, Social Class",
author = "Willis, {A M} and Smith, {S K} and B Meiser and Ballinger, {M L} and Thomas, {D M} and M-A Young",
note = "{\circledC} 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/cge.12868",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "121--133",
journal = "Clinical Genetics",
issn = "0009-9163",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Willis, A M

AU - Smith, S K

AU - Meiser, B

AU - Ballinger, M L

AU - Thomas, D M

AU - Young, M-A

N1 - © 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Evidence suggests that a significant proportion of individuals referred to cancer genetic counselling (GC) do not attend, and thus may not be engaged in adequate cancer risk management. We aimed to review the literature to better understand barriers to accessing GC and how they may be overcome. We conducted a systematic literature search for articles examining factors influencing cancer GC uptake as well as motivators and barriers to GC attendance. Factors were categorised as sociodemographic, psychosocial or clinical. The literature search identified 1413 citations, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. GC uptake ranged from 19% to 88%. With the exceptions of education level, socioeconomic status, cancer-specific distress, personal cancer diagnosis and actual and perceived risk of cancer, support was lacking for most sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial factors as predictors of GC uptake. Cost and logistical barriers, emotional concerns, family concerns and low perceived personal relevance were reported as important considerations for those declining GC. We conclude that there is poor understanding of GC and a lack of decision support among those referred to GC. Research into ways of providing education and support to referred individuals will be important as the scope and availability of GC and genetic testing broaden.

AB - Evidence suggests that a significant proportion of individuals referred to cancer genetic counselling (GC) do not attend, and thus may not be engaged in adequate cancer risk management. We aimed to review the literature to better understand barriers to accessing GC and how they may be overcome. We conducted a systematic literature search for articles examining factors influencing cancer GC uptake as well as motivators and barriers to GC attendance. Factors were categorised as sociodemographic, psychosocial or clinical. The literature search identified 1413 citations, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. GC uptake ranged from 19% to 88%. With the exceptions of education level, socioeconomic status, cancer-specific distress, personal cancer diagnosis and actual and perceived risk of cancer, support was lacking for most sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial factors as predictors of GC uptake. Cost and logistical barriers, emotional concerns, family concerns and low perceived personal relevance were reported as important considerations for those declining GC. We conclude that there is poor understanding of GC and a lack of decision support among those referred to GC. Research into ways of providing education and support to referred individuals will be important as the scope and availability of GC and genetic testing broaden.

KW - Genetic Counseling/psychology

KW - Genetic Predisposition to Disease

KW - Humans

KW - Neoplasms/diagnosis

KW - Social Class

U2 - 10.1111/cge.12868

DO - 10.1111/cge.12868

M3 - Review article

VL - 92

SP - 121

EP - 133

JO - Clinical Genetics

JF - Clinical Genetics

SN - 0009-9163

IS - 2

ER -