Socially responsible supply chains: Power asymmetries and joint dependence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the role of relational power/dependent asymmetries and symmetries in shaping socially responsible supply chain management, whilst also examining how these issues are moderated by geographical distance between buyer and supplier.
Design/methodology/approach: The study draws on data from 339 buyer-supplier relationships, and we use a set of hierarchical regression models to test our hypotheses.
Findings: Joint dependency positively influences socially responsible supply chain management, whilst supplier power constrains it. Both joint dependency and buyer power becomes increasingly important determinants of socially responsible supply chain management as geographic distance increases.
Research limitations/implications: Further work is needed to examine the conditions under which organisations will exercise their power advantage or their joint dependence position to improve socially responsible processes in the supply chain, as there may be situations where buyer chooses not to exercise their power positions.
Practical implications: Our results indicate that jointly dependent relationships create the best conditions for socially responsible supply chain management, but we also find that supplier power advantage can constrain such initiatives.
Originality/value: This is the first paper to systematically analyse the implementation of socially responsible supply chain management, within a model that considers power a/symmetric positions of the buyer-supplier relationship, and the role of geographical distance as a moderating influence on these power positions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages277-291
Number of pages15
JournalSupply Chain Management: An International Journal
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Supply chain
Asymmetry
Supply chain management
Suppliers
Buyers
Exercise
Buyer-supplier relationships
Regression model
Hierarchical regression
Buyer power
Hypothesis test
Symmetry
Design methodology

Keywords

  • Sustainability
  • Supply chain management
  • social responsibility
  • power / dependence

Cite this

Socially responsible supply chains : Power asymmetries and joint dependence. / Hoejmose, Stefan; Grosvold, Johanne; Millington, Andrew.

In: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, 04.2013, p. 277-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ab5e4fdb1964ab7b4870b2e0fa7d604,
title = "Socially responsible supply chains: Power asymmetries and joint dependence",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the role of relational power/dependent asymmetries and symmetries in shaping socially responsible supply chain management, whilst also examining how these issues are moderated by geographical distance between buyer and supplier.Design/methodology/approach: The study draws on data from 339 buyer-supplier relationships, and we use a set of hierarchical regression models to test our hypotheses. Findings: Joint dependency positively influences socially responsible supply chain management, whilst supplier power constrains it. Both joint dependency and buyer power becomes increasingly important determinants of socially responsible supply chain management as geographic distance increases.Research limitations/implications: Further work is needed to examine the conditions under which organisations will exercise their power advantage or their joint dependence position to improve socially responsible processes in the supply chain, as there may be situations where buyer chooses not to exercise their power positions.Practical implications: Our results indicate that jointly dependent relationships create the best conditions for socially responsible supply chain management, but we also find that supplier power advantage can constrain such initiatives. Originality/value: This is the first paper to systematically analyse the implementation of socially responsible supply chain management, within a model that considers power a/symmetric positions of the buyer-supplier relationship, and the role of geographical distance as a moderating influence on these power positions.",
keywords = "Sustainability, Supply chain management, social responsibility, power / dependence",
author = "Stefan Hoejmose and Johanne Grosvold and Andrew Millington",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1108/SCM-01-2012-0033",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "277--291",
journal = "Supply Chain Management: An International Journal",
issn = "1359-8546",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socially responsible supply chains

T2 - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

AU - Hoejmose, Stefan

AU - Grosvold, Johanne

AU - Millington, Andrew

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the role of relational power/dependent asymmetries and symmetries in shaping socially responsible supply chain management, whilst also examining how these issues are moderated by geographical distance between buyer and supplier.Design/methodology/approach: The study draws on data from 339 buyer-supplier relationships, and we use a set of hierarchical regression models to test our hypotheses. Findings: Joint dependency positively influences socially responsible supply chain management, whilst supplier power constrains it. Both joint dependency and buyer power becomes increasingly important determinants of socially responsible supply chain management as geographic distance increases.Research limitations/implications: Further work is needed to examine the conditions under which organisations will exercise their power advantage or their joint dependence position to improve socially responsible processes in the supply chain, as there may be situations where buyer chooses not to exercise their power positions.Practical implications: Our results indicate that jointly dependent relationships create the best conditions for socially responsible supply chain management, but we also find that supplier power advantage can constrain such initiatives. Originality/value: This is the first paper to systematically analyse the implementation of socially responsible supply chain management, within a model that considers power a/symmetric positions of the buyer-supplier relationship, and the role of geographical distance as a moderating influence on these power positions.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the role of relational power/dependent asymmetries and symmetries in shaping socially responsible supply chain management, whilst also examining how these issues are moderated by geographical distance between buyer and supplier.Design/methodology/approach: The study draws on data from 339 buyer-supplier relationships, and we use a set of hierarchical regression models to test our hypotheses. Findings: Joint dependency positively influences socially responsible supply chain management, whilst supplier power constrains it. Both joint dependency and buyer power becomes increasingly important determinants of socially responsible supply chain management as geographic distance increases.Research limitations/implications: Further work is needed to examine the conditions under which organisations will exercise their power advantage or their joint dependence position to improve socially responsible processes in the supply chain, as there may be situations where buyer chooses not to exercise their power positions.Practical implications: Our results indicate that jointly dependent relationships create the best conditions for socially responsible supply chain management, but we also find that supplier power advantage can constrain such initiatives. Originality/value: This is the first paper to systematically analyse the implementation of socially responsible supply chain management, within a model that considers power a/symmetric positions of the buyer-supplier relationship, and the role of geographical distance as a moderating influence on these power positions.

KW - Sustainability

KW - Supply chain management

KW - social responsibility

KW - power / dependence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878829607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2012-0033

U2 - 10.1108/SCM-01-2012-0033

DO - 10.1108/SCM-01-2012-0033

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 277

EP - 291

JO - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

JF - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

SN - 1359-8546

IS - 3

ER -