Socially Responsible Investment Portfolios: Does the Optimization Process Matter?

Ioannis Oikonomou, Emmanouil Platanakis, Charles Sutcliffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the choice of optimization technique when constructing Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) portfolios. Corporate Social Performance (CSP) scores are price sensitive information that is subject to considerable estimation risk. Therefore, uncertainty in the input parameters is greater for SRI portfolios than conventional portfolios, and this affects the selection of the appropriate optimization method. We form SRI portfolios based on six different approaches and compare their performance along the dimensions of risk, risk-return trade-off, diversification and stability. Our results for SRI portfolios contradict those of the conventional portfolio optimization literature. We find that the more “formal” optimization approaches (Black-Litterman, Markowitz and robust estimation) lead to SRI portfolios that are both less risky and have superior risk-return trade-offs than do more simplistic approaches; although they also have more unstable asset allocations and lower diversification. Our conclusions are robust to a series of tests, including the use of different estimation windows and stricter screening criteria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-401
Number of pages23
JournalBritish Accounting Review
Volume50
Issue number4
Early online date28 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018
EventFMA European Conference - Helsinki, Finland
Duration: 9 Jun 201610 Jun 2016
http://www.fma.org/Helsinki/

Fingerprint

Process optimization
Socially responsible investment
Investment portfolio
Diversification
Asset allocation
Risk-return trade-off
Portfolio optimization
Risk-return
Trade-offs
Screening
Robust estimation
Estimation risk
Corporate social performance
Uncertainty
Optimization techniques

Keywords

  • Corporate social responsibility
  • CSR
  • CSP
  • SRI
  • Sustainability
  • Portfolio optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Socially Responsible Investment Portfolios : Does the Optimization Process Matter? / Oikonomou, Ioannis; Platanakis, Emmanouil; Sutcliffe, Charles.

In: British Accounting Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, 01.06.2018, p. 379-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b252fa4d1a1c4f88b57f70ddfdd56ec8,
title = "Socially Responsible Investment Portfolios: Does the Optimization Process Matter?",
abstract = "This study investigates the impact of the choice of optimization technique when constructing Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) portfolios. Corporate Social Performance (CSP) scores are price sensitive information that is subject to considerable estimation risk. Therefore, uncertainty in the input parameters is greater for SRI portfolios than conventional portfolios, and this affects the selection of the appropriate optimization method. We form SRI portfolios based on six different approaches and compare their performance along the dimensions of risk, risk-return trade-off, diversification and stability. Our results for SRI portfolios contradict those of the conventional portfolio optimization literature. We find that the more “formal” optimization approaches (Black-Litterman, Markowitz and robust estimation) lead to SRI portfolios that are both less risky and have superior risk-return trade-offs than do more simplistic approaches; although they also have more unstable asset allocations and lower diversification. Our conclusions are robust to a series of tests, including the use of different estimation windows and stricter screening criteria.",
keywords = "Corporate social responsibility, CSR, CSP, SRI, Sustainability, Portfolio optimization",
author = "Ioannis Oikonomou and Emmanouil Platanakis and Charles Sutcliffe",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.003",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "379--401",
journal = "British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Elsevier Academic Press Inc",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socially Responsible Investment Portfolios

T2 - Does the Optimization Process Matter?

AU - Oikonomou, Ioannis

AU - Platanakis, Emmanouil

AU - Sutcliffe, Charles

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - This study investigates the impact of the choice of optimization technique when constructing Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) portfolios. Corporate Social Performance (CSP) scores are price sensitive information that is subject to considerable estimation risk. Therefore, uncertainty in the input parameters is greater for SRI portfolios than conventional portfolios, and this affects the selection of the appropriate optimization method. We form SRI portfolios based on six different approaches and compare their performance along the dimensions of risk, risk-return trade-off, diversification and stability. Our results for SRI portfolios contradict those of the conventional portfolio optimization literature. We find that the more “formal” optimization approaches (Black-Litterman, Markowitz and robust estimation) lead to SRI portfolios that are both less risky and have superior risk-return trade-offs than do more simplistic approaches; although they also have more unstable asset allocations and lower diversification. Our conclusions are robust to a series of tests, including the use of different estimation windows and stricter screening criteria.

AB - This study investigates the impact of the choice of optimization technique when constructing Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) portfolios. Corporate Social Performance (CSP) scores are price sensitive information that is subject to considerable estimation risk. Therefore, uncertainty in the input parameters is greater for SRI portfolios than conventional portfolios, and this affects the selection of the appropriate optimization method. We form SRI portfolios based on six different approaches and compare their performance along the dimensions of risk, risk-return trade-off, diversification and stability. Our results for SRI portfolios contradict those of the conventional portfolio optimization literature. We find that the more “formal” optimization approaches (Black-Litterman, Markowitz and robust estimation) lead to SRI portfolios that are both less risky and have superior risk-return trade-offs than do more simplistic approaches; although they also have more unstable asset allocations and lower diversification. Our conclusions are robust to a series of tests, including the use of different estimation windows and stricter screening criteria.

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - CSR

KW - CSP

KW - SRI

KW - Sustainability

KW - Portfolio optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036537671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 379

EP - 401

JO - British Accounting Review

JF - British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

IS - 4

ER -