Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Social support and salivary cortisol in women with metastatic breast cancer

  • Julie M Turner-Cobb
  • , Sandra E Sephton
  • , Cheryl Koopman
  • , Jane Blake-Mortimer
  • , David Spiegel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

214   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Used a cross-sectional design to examine the relationships between social support, both quantity (number of people) and quality (appraisal, belonging, tangible, and self-esteem), and neuroendocrine function (mean and slope of diurnal salivary cortisol) among women with metastatic breast cancer. 103 Ss (mean age 53.2 yrs) completed the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List and the Yale Social Support Index and provided saliva samples for assessment of diurnal cortisol levels on each of 3 consecutive days. Results show that mean salivary cortisol was negatively related to the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List subscales of appraisal, belonging, and tangible social support. No association was found between quantitative support or the esteem subscale of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List and mean salivary cortisol. Measures of qualitative and quantitative social support were not associated with the diurnal cortisol slope. It is concluded that greater quality of social support is associated with lower cortisol concentrations in women with metastatic breast cancer, which is indicative of healthier neuroendocrine functioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-345
Number of pages9
JournalPsychosomatic Medicine
Volume62 May-Jun
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social support and salivary cortisol in women with metastatic breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this