Social standards: An empirical examination of early and late adopters’ motives and attitudes.

Konstantinos Iatridis, Andrei Kuznetsov

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Certifiable management standards (CMS) are an important means of translating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) agenda into managerial practices. There is no agreement in the literature, however, about their effectiveness. This paper argues that the latter depends on the motives and dedication of the firms that subscribe to the standards and reveals that there are notable differences in this regard between early and late adopters. Utilising survey data, and employing discriminant analysis, this study demonstrates that late adopters’ decision to subscribe to a CMS is mostly related to competitive factors, rather than ethical or relational motives. The results also indicate that late adopters tend to use CMS as symbolic statements of conformance to societal demands rather than in a sincere pursuit of a CSR agenda. More generally, these findings suggest that, in certain institutional contexts, self-regulation, although meeting necessary formal requirements, may miss its intended targets nonetheless.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationAcademy of Management Proceedings
PublisherAcademy of Management
ISBN (Electronic)doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2016.13147abstract
StatusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
EventAcademy of Management - , UK United Kingdom
Duration: 20 Mar 2016 → …

Conference

ConferenceAcademy of Management
CountryUK United Kingdom
Period20/03/16 → …

Fingerprint

Social standards
Management standards
Agenda
Corporate Social Responsibility
Self-regulation
Institutional context
Managerial practices
Discriminant analysis
Factors
Survey data

Cite this

Iatridis, K., & Kuznetsov, A. (2017). Social standards: An empirical examination of early and late adopters’ motives and attitudes. In Academy of Management Proceedings Academy of Management.

Social standards: An empirical examination of early and late adopters’ motives and attitudes. / Iatridis, Konstantinos; Kuznetsov, Andrei .

Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management, 2017.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Iatridis, K & Kuznetsov, A 2017, Social standards: An empirical examination of early and late adopters’ motives and attitudes. in Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management, Academy of Management, UK United Kingdom, 20/03/16.
Iatridis K, Kuznetsov A. Social standards: An empirical examination of early and late adopters’ motives and attitudes. In Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management. 2017
Iatridis, Konstantinos ; Kuznetsov, Andrei . / Social standards: An empirical examination of early and late adopters’ motives and attitudes. Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management, 2017.
@inproceedings{be7db2ad6cfb416fb496ded6013c94b8,
title = "Social standards: An empirical examination of early and late adopters’ motives and attitudes.",
abstract = "Certifiable management standards (CMS) are an important means of translating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) agenda into managerial practices. There is no agreement in the literature, however, about their effectiveness. This paper argues that the latter depends on the motives and dedication of the firms that subscribe to the standards and reveals that there are notable differences in this regard between early and late adopters. Utilising survey data, and employing discriminant analysis, this study demonstrates that late adopters’ decision to subscribe to a CMS is mostly related to competitive factors, rather than ethical or relational motives. The results also indicate that late adopters tend to use CMS as symbolic statements of conformance to societal demands rather than in a sincere pursuit of a CSR agenda. More generally, these findings suggest that, in certain institutional contexts, self-regulation, although meeting necessary formal requirements, may miss its intended targets nonetheless.",
author = "Konstantinos Iatridis and Andrei Kuznetsov",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
address = "USA United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Social standards: An empirical examination of early and late adopters’ motives and attitudes.

AU - Iatridis, Konstantinos

AU - Kuznetsov, Andrei

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Certifiable management standards (CMS) are an important means of translating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) agenda into managerial practices. There is no agreement in the literature, however, about their effectiveness. This paper argues that the latter depends on the motives and dedication of the firms that subscribe to the standards and reveals that there are notable differences in this regard between early and late adopters. Utilising survey data, and employing discriminant analysis, this study demonstrates that late adopters’ decision to subscribe to a CMS is mostly related to competitive factors, rather than ethical or relational motives. The results also indicate that late adopters tend to use CMS as symbolic statements of conformance to societal demands rather than in a sincere pursuit of a CSR agenda. More generally, these findings suggest that, in certain institutional contexts, self-regulation, although meeting necessary formal requirements, may miss its intended targets nonetheless.

AB - Certifiable management standards (CMS) are an important means of translating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) agenda into managerial practices. There is no agreement in the literature, however, about their effectiveness. This paper argues that the latter depends on the motives and dedication of the firms that subscribe to the standards and reveals that there are notable differences in this regard between early and late adopters. Utilising survey data, and employing discriminant analysis, this study demonstrates that late adopters’ decision to subscribe to a CMS is mostly related to competitive factors, rather than ethical or relational motives. The results also indicate that late adopters tend to use CMS as symbolic statements of conformance to societal demands rather than in a sincere pursuit of a CSR agenda. More generally, these findings suggest that, in certain institutional contexts, self-regulation, although meeting necessary formal requirements, may miss its intended targets nonetheless.

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Academy of Management Proceedings

PB - Academy of Management

ER -