TY - JOUR
T1 - Social learning and human mate preferences
T2 - a potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction
AU - Little, Anthony C.
AU - Jones, Benedict C.
AU - Debruine, Lisa M.
AU - Caldwell, Christine A.
PY - 2011/2/12
Y1 - 2011/2/12
N2 - Inspired by studies demonstrating mate-choice copying effects in non-human species, recent studies of attractiveness judgements suggest that social learning also influences human preferences. In the first part of our article, we review evidence for social learning effects on preferences in humans and other animals. In the second part, we present new empirical evidence that social learning not only influences the attractiveness of specific individuals, but can also generalize to judgements of previously unseen individuals possessing similar physical traits. The different conditions represent different populations and, once a preference arises in a population, social learning can lead to the spread of preferences within that population. In the final part of our article, we discuss the theoretical basis for, and possible impact of, biases in social learning whereby individuals may preferentially copy the choices of those with high status or better access to critical information about potential mates. Such biases could mean that the choices of a select few individuals carry the greatest weight, rapidly generating agreement in preferences within a population. Collectively, these issues suggest that social learning mechanisms encourage the spread of preferences for certain traits once they arise within a population and so may explain certain cross-cultural differences.
AB - Inspired by studies demonstrating mate-choice copying effects in non-human species, recent studies of attractiveness judgements suggest that social learning also influences human preferences. In the first part of our article, we review evidence for social learning effects on preferences in humans and other animals. In the second part, we present new empirical evidence that social learning not only influences the attractiveness of specific individuals, but can also generalize to judgements of previously unseen individuals possessing similar physical traits. The different conditions represent different populations and, once a preference arises in a population, social learning can lead to the spread of preferences within that population. In the final part of our article, we discuss the theoretical basis for, and possible impact of, biases in social learning whereby individuals may preferentially copy the choices of those with high status or better access to critical information about potential mates. Such biases could mean that the choices of a select few individuals carry the greatest weight, rapidly generating agreement in preferences within a population. Collectively, these issues suggest that social learning mechanisms encourage the spread of preferences for certain traits once they arise within a population and so may explain certain cross-cultural differences.
KW - Copy
KW - Culture
KW - Facial attractiveness
KW - Learning
KW - Prestige bias
KW - Social transmission
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951829385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0192
U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2010.0192
DO - 10.1098/rstb.2010.0192
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21199841
AN - SCOPUS:79951829385
SN - 0962-8436
VL - 366
SP - 366
EP - 375
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 1563
ER -