Social learning and human mate preferences: a potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction

Anthony C. Little, Benedict C. Jones, Lisa M. Debruine, Christine A. Caldwell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inspired by studies demonstrating mate-choice copying effects in non-human species, recent studies of attractiveness judgements suggest that social learning also influences human preferences. In the first part of our article, we review evidence for social learning effects on preferences in humans and other animals. In the second part, we present new empirical evidence that social learning not only influences the attractiveness of specific individuals, but can also generalize to judgements of previously unseen individuals possessing similar physical traits. The different conditions represent different populations and, once a preference arises in a population, social learning can lead to the spread of preferences within that population. In the final part of our article, we discuss the theoretical basis for, and possible impact of, biases in social learning whereby individuals may preferentially copy the choices of those with high status or better access to critical information about potential mates. Such biases could mean that the choices of a select few individuals carry the greatest weight, rapidly generating agreement in preferences within a population. Collectively, these issues suggest that social learning mechanisms encourage the spread of preferences for certain traits once they arise within a population and so may explain certain cross-cultural differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)366-375
Number of pages10
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume366
Issue number1563
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Copying
mating behavior
Animals
learning
Population
cultural differences
Access to Information
mate choice
Social Learning
Weights and Measures
animal
animals

Keywords

  • Copy
  • Culture
  • Facial attractiveness
  • Learning
  • Prestige bias
  • Social transmission

Cite this

Social learning and human mate preferences : a potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction. / Little, Anthony C.; Jones, Benedict C.; Debruine, Lisa M.; Caldwell, Christine A.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 366, No. 1563, 12.02.2011, p. 366-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e4d9cd5f363e415a90f67ef92576b87d,
title = "Social learning and human mate preferences: a potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction",
abstract = "Inspired by studies demonstrating mate-choice copying effects in non-human species, recent studies of attractiveness judgements suggest that social learning also influences human preferences. In the first part of our article, we review evidence for social learning effects on preferences in humans and other animals. In the second part, we present new empirical evidence that social learning not only influences the attractiveness of specific individuals, but can also generalize to judgements of previously unseen individuals possessing similar physical traits. The different conditions represent different populations and, once a preference arises in a population, social learning can lead to the spread of preferences within that population. In the final part of our article, we discuss the theoretical basis for, and possible impact of, biases in social learning whereby individuals may preferentially copy the choices of those with high status or better access to critical information about potential mates. Such biases could mean that the choices of a select few individuals carry the greatest weight, rapidly generating agreement in preferences within a population. Collectively, these issues suggest that social learning mechanisms encourage the spread of preferences for certain traits once they arise within a population and so may explain certain cross-cultural differences.",
keywords = "Copy, Culture, Facial attractiveness, Learning, Prestige bias, Social transmission",
author = "Little, {Anthony C.} and Jones, {Benedict C.} and Debruine, {Lisa M.} and Caldwell, {Christine A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1098/rstb.2010.0192",
language = "English",
volume = "366",
pages = "366--375",
journal = "Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "1563",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social learning and human mate preferences

T2 - a potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction

AU - Little, Anthony C.

AU - Jones, Benedict C.

AU - Debruine, Lisa M.

AU - Caldwell, Christine A.

PY - 2011/2/12

Y1 - 2011/2/12

N2 - Inspired by studies demonstrating mate-choice copying effects in non-human species, recent studies of attractiveness judgements suggest that social learning also influences human preferences. In the first part of our article, we review evidence for social learning effects on preferences in humans and other animals. In the second part, we present new empirical evidence that social learning not only influences the attractiveness of specific individuals, but can also generalize to judgements of previously unseen individuals possessing similar physical traits. The different conditions represent different populations and, once a preference arises in a population, social learning can lead to the spread of preferences within that population. In the final part of our article, we discuss the theoretical basis for, and possible impact of, biases in social learning whereby individuals may preferentially copy the choices of those with high status or better access to critical information about potential mates. Such biases could mean that the choices of a select few individuals carry the greatest weight, rapidly generating agreement in preferences within a population. Collectively, these issues suggest that social learning mechanisms encourage the spread of preferences for certain traits once they arise within a population and so may explain certain cross-cultural differences.

AB - Inspired by studies demonstrating mate-choice copying effects in non-human species, recent studies of attractiveness judgements suggest that social learning also influences human preferences. In the first part of our article, we review evidence for social learning effects on preferences in humans and other animals. In the second part, we present new empirical evidence that social learning not only influences the attractiveness of specific individuals, but can also generalize to judgements of previously unseen individuals possessing similar physical traits. The different conditions represent different populations and, once a preference arises in a population, social learning can lead to the spread of preferences within that population. In the final part of our article, we discuss the theoretical basis for, and possible impact of, biases in social learning whereby individuals may preferentially copy the choices of those with high status or better access to critical information about potential mates. Such biases could mean that the choices of a select few individuals carry the greatest weight, rapidly generating agreement in preferences within a population. Collectively, these issues suggest that social learning mechanisms encourage the spread of preferences for certain traits once they arise within a population and so may explain certain cross-cultural differences.

KW - Copy

KW - Culture

KW - Facial attractiveness

KW - Learning

KW - Prestige bias

KW - Social transmission

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951829385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0192

U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2010.0192

DO - 10.1098/rstb.2010.0192

M3 - Review article

C2 - 21199841

AN - SCOPUS:79951829385

VL - 366

SP - 366

EP - 375

JO - Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1563

ER -