Abstract
Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b) Can investors be nudged along this continuum?
We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 9 Jul 2018 |
| Event | 8th International Conference on Restructuring of the Global Economy (ROGE) - Said Business School, Oxford, UK United Kingdom Duration: 9 Jul 2018 → 10 Jul 2018 http://www.abrmr.com/index.php?view=conference_details&id=5003 |
Conference
| Conference | 8th International Conference on Restructuring of the Global Economy (ROGE) |
|---|---|
| Country | UK United Kingdom |
| City | Oxford |
| Period | 9/07/18 → 10/07/18 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- social investment
- Nudge
- social behaviour
- charity
- Decision-making
- eye-tracking
- Investment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Cite this
Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation. / Hinvest, Neal; Fairchild, Richard; El-Kholy, Habiba.
2018. Paper presented at 8th International Conference on Restructuring of the Global Economy (ROGE), Oxford, UK United Kingdom.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper
}
TY - CONF
T1 - Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation
AU - Hinvest, Neal
AU - Fairchild, Richard
AU - El-Kholy, Habiba
PY - 2018/7/9
Y1 - 2018/7/9
N2 - Investing into the financial markets has become increasingly complex in recent years, with a multitude of investment products and motives. With the rapid growth in social investing and social entrepreneurship, scholars recognise that investors and entrepreneurs often consider a wide range of social factors, in addition to financial return, when making their financial decisions. Pilaj (2017) has called for increased focus on testing these mixed financial and ethical motives of investors, and whether nudges can be effective in nudging investors towards social investments.Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b) Can investors be nudged along this continuum?We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.
AB - Investing into the financial markets has become increasingly complex in recent years, with a multitude of investment products and motives. With the rapid growth in social investing and social entrepreneurship, scholars recognise that investors and entrepreneurs often consider a wide range of social factors, in addition to financial return, when making their financial decisions. Pilaj (2017) has called for increased focus on testing these mixed financial and ethical motives of investors, and whether nudges can be effective in nudging investors towards social investments.Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b) Can investors be nudged along this continuum?We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.
KW - social investment
KW - Nudge
KW - social behaviour
KW - charity
KW - Decision-making
KW - eye-tracking
KW - Investment
M3 - Paper
ER -