Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Investing into the financial markets has become increasingly complex in recent years, with a multitude of investment products and motives. With the rapid growth in social investing and social entrepreneurship, scholars recognise that investors and entrepreneurs often consider a wide range of social factors, in addition to financial return, when making their financial decisions. Pilaj (2017) has called for increased focus on testing these mixed financial and ethical motives of investors, and whether nudges can be effective in nudging investors towards social investments.

Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b) Can investors be nudged along this continuum?
We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.

Workshop

WorkshopEntrepreneurship: Behavioral and Cognitive Approaches Workshop
CountryUK United Kingdom
CityBath
Period13/09/1814/09/18

Fingerprint

Economics
Motivation
Behavioral Economics
Entrepreneurship
Social Behavior
Research
Decision Making
Psychology
Mindset
Ethical investing
Neuroeconomics
Investors
Growth
Financial returns
Experiment
Social returns

Keywords

  • investment
  • decision making
  • social investment
  • social behaviour
  • charity
  • eye-tracking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Hinvest, N., Fairchild, R., & El-Kholy, H. (2018). Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation. Paper presented at Entrepreneurship: Behavioral and Cognitive Approaches Workshop, Bath, UK United Kingdom.

Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation. / Hinvest, Neal; Fairchild, Richard; El-Kholy, Habiba.

2018. Paper presented at Entrepreneurship: Behavioral and Cognitive Approaches Workshop, Bath, UK United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Hinvest, N, Fairchild, R & El-Kholy, H 2018, 'Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation' Paper presented at Entrepreneurship: Behavioral and Cognitive Approaches Workshop, Bath, UK United Kingdom, 13/09/18 - 14/09/18, .
Hinvest N, Fairchild R, El-Kholy H. Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation. 2018. Paper presented at Entrepreneurship: Behavioral and Cognitive Approaches Workshop, Bath, UK United Kingdom.
Hinvest, Neal ; Fairchild, Richard ; El-Kholy, Habiba. / Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation. Paper presented at Entrepreneurship: Behavioral and Cognitive Approaches Workshop, Bath, UK United Kingdom.
@conference{082319292b304f3a8b2d1796f13d096f,
title = "Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation",
abstract = "Investing into the financial markets has become increasingly complex in recent years, with a multitude of investment products and motives. With the rapid growth in social investing and social entrepreneurship, scholars recognise that investors and entrepreneurs often consider a wide range of social factors, in addition to financial return, when making their financial decisions. Pilaj (2017) has called for increased focus on testing these mixed financial and ethical motives of investors, and whether nudges can be effective in nudging investors towards social investments.Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b) Can investors be nudged along this continuum?We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.",
keywords = "investment, decision making, social investment, social behaviour, charity, eye-tracking",
author = "Neal Hinvest and Richard Fairchild and Habiba El-Kholy",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "13",
language = "English",
note = "Entrepreneurship: Behavioral and Cognitive Approaches Workshop ; Conference date: 13-09-2018 Through 14-09-2018",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Social Investing, Ethical Mind-sets, and Nudges: A Neuro-economic Investigation

AU - Hinvest,Neal

AU - Fairchild,Richard

AU - El-Kholy,Habiba

PY - 2018/9/13

Y1 - 2018/9/13

N2 - Investing into the financial markets has become increasingly complex in recent years, with a multitude of investment products and motives. With the rapid growth in social investing and social entrepreneurship, scholars recognise that investors and entrepreneurs often consider a wide range of social factors, in addition to financial return, when making their financial decisions. Pilaj (2017) has called for increased focus on testing these mixed financial and ethical motives of investors, and whether nudges can be effective in nudging investors towards social investments.Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b) Can investors be nudged along this continuum?We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.

AB - Investing into the financial markets has become increasingly complex in recent years, with a multitude of investment products and motives. With the rapid growth in social investing and social entrepreneurship, scholars recognise that investors and entrepreneurs often consider a wide range of social factors, in addition to financial return, when making their financial decisions. Pilaj (2017) has called for increased focus on testing these mixed financial and ethical motives of investors, and whether nudges can be effective in nudging investors towards social investments.Behavioural economists argue that it is important to understand the complex economic and behavioural/psychological factors affecting social investors’ decision-making. In this paper, we draw upon lessons from behavioural economics (and in particular, social preference theory) in order to develop neuro-economic tests of investors’ social and financial mind-sets. We focus on two main research questions: a) How heterogeneous are (social-) investors, in terms of the unconscious weightings that they place upon financial and social returns? Can investors’ mind-sets be placed upon a continuum from focussing on social returns, through mixed motivations/weightings, through to focussing on financial returns? b) Can investors be nudged along this continuum?We address these two research questions by means of two neuro-experiments. We employ eye-tracking techniques to examine investors’ attention to, and fixation on, social and financial aspects of financial market investment. In addition, we employ nudges in the form of images relating to positive and negative social behaviour. Our experiments demonstrate that a) investors can indeed be placed on the financial-social motivation continuum (and that there is heterogeneity in social-investors’ motives along this scale), and b) investors can be nudged along the scale. Our experiments thus provide policy implications regarding nudges towards social investment. Practically, we suggest the development of a phone application that integrates real-time stock-tracking with nudges in order to inspire socially responsible investing; banks would play a key role in encouraging its download. Nudges can help to overcome the conflict between social and financial returns.

KW - investment

KW - decision making

KW - social investment

KW - social behaviour

KW - charity

KW - eye-tracking

M3 - Paper

ER -