Social Influence across conversational contexts: a new taxonomy of social influence techniques and public understanding of the characteristics of persuasion, manipulation, and coercion in interpersonal dialogue

Kate Muir, Nigel Dewdney, Faye Walker, Adam Joinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We propose a taxonomy of seven social influence strategies and 42 techniques for interpersonal dialogue across diverse settings. Perceptions of these techniques, gathered from 164 UK participants, show persuasive techniques as low-harm and covert, while manipulative-coercive techniques are high-harm and overt. Ambiguities exist where some techniques fit both categories, highlighting significant variability in individual perceptions. We highlight that even benign techniques like humour or friendliness can covertly bypass defences, hiding the speaker's true intentions. This work underscores the importance of understanding receiver perceptions of social influence techniques across a range of settings, including interactions with large language models (LLMs), which may employ such techniques. By offering a universal taxonomy of social influence techniques and associated public perceptions, we aim to enhance understanding of social influence in varied conversational contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2590842
JournalSocial Influence
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date28 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2025

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request

Keywords

  • coercion
  • interpersonal interaction
  • manipulation
  • Persuasion
  • taxonomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Influence across conversational contexts: a new taxonomy of social influence techniques and public understanding of the characteristics of persuasion, manipulation, and coercion in interpersonal dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this