‘So much choice and no choice at all’

A socio-psychoanalytic interpretation of consumerism as a source of pollution

Elizabeth Nixon, Yiannis Gabriel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychoanalytic concepts and theory have long served studies of consumption, from exposing unconscious motives to elucidating contemporary consuming desire. Sharing with psychoanalysis an interest in symbolic meanings, anthropological approaches have also contributed to the study of contemporary consumption and social life. In this article, we draw on both Freudian psychoanalysis and Douglas’s structural anthropology to examine the field of non-consumption or the ‘choice’ not to buy. Based on detailed interpretations of interview data, we argue that consuming less at the individual level is not always the result of purposeful acts of ideological, anti-consumption protest or the outward expression of countercultural sentiments. Rather, forms of non-consumption can have deeper psychological origins that are located in a view of consumerism as a threatening force and a potent source of toxic contamination to mind and body, ‘dirt’ in Douglas’s conceptualization. We argue that this outlook prompts a constant vigilance and the deployment of different defensive measures, prohibitions and purification rituals akin to Freud’s conceptualization of the obsessive–compulsive individual. In this way, our analysis seeks to illuminate the myriad of largely invisible ways in which some people ‘choose’ not to buy within an ostensibly consumer culture or dismiss the idea of such a choice altogether.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-56
Number of pages18
JournalMarketing Theory
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Consumerism
Pollution
Psychoanalysis
Conceptualization
Contamination
Anthropology
Consumer culture
Anti-consumption
Purification
Prohibition
Protest
Sentiment
Psychological

Keywords

  • Choice
  • consumerism
  • Douglas
  • Freud
  • marketplace
  • non-consumption
  • obsessive–compulsive
  • pollution

Cite this

‘So much choice and no choice at all’ : A socio-psychoanalytic interpretation of consumerism as a source of pollution. / Nixon, Elizabeth; Gabriel, Yiannis.

In: Marketing Theory, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 39-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1562cb00eb247e8b9f06b92cffe299d,
title = "‘So much choice and no choice at all’: A socio-psychoanalytic interpretation of consumerism as a source of pollution",
abstract = "Psychoanalytic concepts and theory have long served studies of consumption, from exposing unconscious motives to elucidating contemporary consuming desire. Sharing with psychoanalysis an interest in symbolic meanings, anthropological approaches have also contributed to the study of contemporary consumption and social life. In this article, we draw on both Freudian psychoanalysis and Douglas’s structural anthropology to examine the field of non-consumption or the ‘choice’ not to buy. Based on detailed interpretations of interview data, we argue that consuming less at the individual level is not always the result of purposeful acts of ideological, anti-consumption protest or the outward expression of countercultural sentiments. Rather, forms of non-consumption can have deeper psychological origins that are located in a view of consumerism as a threatening force and a potent source of toxic contamination to mind and body, ‘dirt’ in Douglas’s conceptualization. We argue that this outlook prompts a constant vigilance and the deployment of different defensive measures, prohibitions and purification rituals akin to Freud’s conceptualization of the obsessive–compulsive individual. In this way, our analysis seeks to illuminate the myriad of largely invisible ways in which some people ‘choose’ not to buy within an ostensibly consumer culture or dismiss the idea of such a choice altogether.",
keywords = "Choice, consumerism, Douglas, Freud, marketplace, non-consumption, obsessive–compulsive, pollution",
author = "Elizabeth Nixon and Yiannis Gabriel",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1470593115593624",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "39--56",
journal = "Marketing Theory",
issn = "1470-5931",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘So much choice and no choice at all’

T2 - A socio-psychoanalytic interpretation of consumerism as a source of pollution

AU - Nixon, Elizabeth

AU - Gabriel, Yiannis

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Psychoanalytic concepts and theory have long served studies of consumption, from exposing unconscious motives to elucidating contemporary consuming desire. Sharing with psychoanalysis an interest in symbolic meanings, anthropological approaches have also contributed to the study of contemporary consumption and social life. In this article, we draw on both Freudian psychoanalysis and Douglas’s structural anthropology to examine the field of non-consumption or the ‘choice’ not to buy. Based on detailed interpretations of interview data, we argue that consuming less at the individual level is not always the result of purposeful acts of ideological, anti-consumption protest or the outward expression of countercultural sentiments. Rather, forms of non-consumption can have deeper psychological origins that are located in a view of consumerism as a threatening force and a potent source of toxic contamination to mind and body, ‘dirt’ in Douglas’s conceptualization. We argue that this outlook prompts a constant vigilance and the deployment of different defensive measures, prohibitions and purification rituals akin to Freud’s conceptualization of the obsessive–compulsive individual. In this way, our analysis seeks to illuminate the myriad of largely invisible ways in which some people ‘choose’ not to buy within an ostensibly consumer culture or dismiss the idea of such a choice altogether.

AB - Psychoanalytic concepts and theory have long served studies of consumption, from exposing unconscious motives to elucidating contemporary consuming desire. Sharing with psychoanalysis an interest in symbolic meanings, anthropological approaches have also contributed to the study of contemporary consumption and social life. In this article, we draw on both Freudian psychoanalysis and Douglas’s structural anthropology to examine the field of non-consumption or the ‘choice’ not to buy. Based on detailed interpretations of interview data, we argue that consuming less at the individual level is not always the result of purposeful acts of ideological, anti-consumption protest or the outward expression of countercultural sentiments. Rather, forms of non-consumption can have deeper psychological origins that are located in a view of consumerism as a threatening force and a potent source of toxic contamination to mind and body, ‘dirt’ in Douglas’s conceptualization. We argue that this outlook prompts a constant vigilance and the deployment of different defensive measures, prohibitions and purification rituals akin to Freud’s conceptualization of the obsessive–compulsive individual. In this way, our analysis seeks to illuminate the myriad of largely invisible ways in which some people ‘choose’ not to buy within an ostensibly consumer culture or dismiss the idea of such a choice altogether.

KW - Choice

KW - consumerism

KW - Douglas

KW - Freud

KW - marketplace

KW - non-consumption

KW - obsessive–compulsive

KW - pollution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958169572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470593115593624

U2 - 10.1177/1470593115593624

DO - 10.1177/1470593115593624

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 39

EP - 56

JO - Marketing Theory

JF - Marketing Theory

SN - 1470-5931

IS - 1

ER -