Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Linda M. O'Keeffe, Gemma Taylor, Rachel R. Huxley, Paul Mitchell, Mark Woodward, Sanne A.E. Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the sex-specific association between smoking and lung cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources We searched PubMed and EMBASE from 1 January 1999 to 15 April 2016 for cohort studies. Cohort studies before 1 January 1999 were retrieved from a previous meta-analysis. Individual participant data from three sources were also available to supplement analyses of published literature. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Cohort studies reporting the sex-specific relative risk (RR) of lung cancer associated with smoking. Results Data from 29 studies representing 99 cohort studies, 7 million individuals and >50 000 incident lung cancer cases were included. The sex-specific RRs and their ratio comparing women with men were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse-variance weighting. The pooled multiple-adjusted lung cancer RR was 6.99 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 5.09 to 9.59) in women and 7.33 (95% CI 4.90 to 10.96) in men. The pooled ratio of the RRs was 0.92 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.16; I 2 =89%; p<0.001), with no evidence of publication bias or differences across major pre-defined participant and study subtypes. The women-to-men ratio of RRs was 0.99 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.52), 1.11 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.64) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.30), for light, moderate and heavy smoking, respectively. Conclusions Smoking yields similar risks of lung cancer in women compared with men. However, these data may underestimate the true risks of lung cancer among women, as the smoking epidemic has not yet reached full maturity in women. Continued efforts to measure the sex-specific association of smoking and lung cancer are required.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere021611
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalBMJ Open
Volume8
Issue number10
Early online date3 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • lung cancer
  • sex-specific
  • smoking
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

O'Keeffe, L. M., Taylor, G., Huxley, R. R., Mitchell, P., Woodward, M., & Peters, S. A. E. (2018). Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 8(10), 1-12. [e021611]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021611

Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men : a systematic review and meta-analysis. / O'Keeffe, Linda M.; Taylor, Gemma; Huxley, Rachel R.; Mitchell, Paul; Woodward, Mark; Peters, Sanne A.E.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 8, No. 10, e021611, 03.10.2018, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Keeffe, LM, Taylor, G, Huxley, RR, Mitchell, P, Woodward, M & Peters, SAE 2018, 'Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis', BMJ Open, vol. 8, no. 10, e021611, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021611
O'Keeffe, Linda M. ; Taylor, Gemma ; Huxley, Rachel R. ; Mitchell, Paul ; Woodward, Mark ; Peters, Sanne A.E. / Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men : a systematic review and meta-analysis. In: BMJ Open. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 10. pp. 1-12.
@article{2ebdd0ac72e74285bdf6b4144b096a9f,
title = "Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objectives To investigate the sex-specific association between smoking and lung cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources We searched PubMed and EMBASE from 1 January 1999 to 15 April 2016 for cohort studies. Cohort studies before 1 January 1999 were retrieved from a previous meta-analysis. Individual participant data from three sources were also available to supplement analyses of published literature. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Cohort studies reporting the sex-specific relative risk (RR) of lung cancer associated with smoking. Results Data from 29 studies representing 99 cohort studies, 7 million individuals and >50 000 incident lung cancer cases were included. The sex-specific RRs and their ratio comparing women with men were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse-variance weighting. The pooled multiple-adjusted lung cancer RR was 6.99 (95{\%} Confidence Interval (CI) 5.09 to 9.59) in women and 7.33 (95{\%} CI 4.90 to 10.96) in men. The pooled ratio of the RRs was 0.92 (95{\%} CI 0.72 to 1.16; I 2 =89{\%}; p<0.001), with no evidence of publication bias or differences across major pre-defined participant and study subtypes. The women-to-men ratio of RRs was 0.99 (95{\%} CI 0.65 to 1.52), 1.11 (95{\%} CI 0.75 to 1.64) and 0.94 (95{\%} CI 0.69 to 1.30), for light, moderate and heavy smoking, respectively. Conclusions Smoking yields similar risks of lung cancer in women compared with men. However, these data may underestimate the true risks of lung cancer among women, as the smoking epidemic has not yet reached full maturity in women. Continued efforts to measure the sex-specific association of smoking and lung cancer are required.",
keywords = "lung cancer, sex-specific, smoking, systematic review",
author = "O'Keeffe, {Linda M.} and Gemma Taylor and Huxley, {Rachel R.} and Paul Mitchell and Mark Woodward and Peters, {Sanne A.E.}",
note = "{\circledC} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021611",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men

T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - O'Keeffe, Linda M.

AU - Taylor, Gemma

AU - Huxley, Rachel R.

AU - Mitchell, Paul

AU - Woodward, Mark

AU - Peters, Sanne A.E.

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2018/10/3

Y1 - 2018/10/3

N2 - Objectives To investigate the sex-specific association between smoking and lung cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources We searched PubMed and EMBASE from 1 January 1999 to 15 April 2016 for cohort studies. Cohort studies before 1 January 1999 were retrieved from a previous meta-analysis. Individual participant data from three sources were also available to supplement analyses of published literature. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Cohort studies reporting the sex-specific relative risk (RR) of lung cancer associated with smoking. Results Data from 29 studies representing 99 cohort studies, 7 million individuals and >50 000 incident lung cancer cases were included. The sex-specific RRs and their ratio comparing women with men were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse-variance weighting. The pooled multiple-adjusted lung cancer RR was 6.99 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 5.09 to 9.59) in women and 7.33 (95% CI 4.90 to 10.96) in men. The pooled ratio of the RRs was 0.92 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.16; I 2 =89%; p<0.001), with no evidence of publication bias or differences across major pre-defined participant and study subtypes. The women-to-men ratio of RRs was 0.99 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.52), 1.11 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.64) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.30), for light, moderate and heavy smoking, respectively. Conclusions Smoking yields similar risks of lung cancer in women compared with men. However, these data may underestimate the true risks of lung cancer among women, as the smoking epidemic has not yet reached full maturity in women. Continued efforts to measure the sex-specific association of smoking and lung cancer are required.

AB - Objectives To investigate the sex-specific association between smoking and lung cancer. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources We searched PubMed and EMBASE from 1 January 1999 to 15 April 2016 for cohort studies. Cohort studies before 1 January 1999 were retrieved from a previous meta-analysis. Individual participant data from three sources were also available to supplement analyses of published literature. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Cohort studies reporting the sex-specific relative risk (RR) of lung cancer associated with smoking. Results Data from 29 studies representing 99 cohort studies, 7 million individuals and >50 000 incident lung cancer cases were included. The sex-specific RRs and their ratio comparing women with men were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with inverse-variance weighting. The pooled multiple-adjusted lung cancer RR was 6.99 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 5.09 to 9.59) in women and 7.33 (95% CI 4.90 to 10.96) in men. The pooled ratio of the RRs was 0.92 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.16; I 2 =89%; p<0.001), with no evidence of publication bias or differences across major pre-defined participant and study subtypes. The women-to-men ratio of RRs was 0.99 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.52), 1.11 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.64) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.30), for light, moderate and heavy smoking, respectively. Conclusions Smoking yields similar risks of lung cancer in women compared with men. However, these data may underestimate the true risks of lung cancer among women, as the smoking epidemic has not yet reached full maturity in women. Continued efforts to measure the sex-specific association of smoking and lung cancer are required.

KW - lung cancer

KW - sex-specific

KW - smoking

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054298910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021611

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021611

M3 - Article

C2 - 30287668

AN - SCOPUS:85054298910

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 10

M1 - e021611

ER -