Simple heuristics from the Adaptive Toolbox: Can we perform the requisite learning?

Tim Rakow, Neal Hinvest, Edward Jackson, Martin Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Adaptive Toolbox framework specifies heuristics for choice and categorisation that search through cues in previously learned orders (Gigerenzer & Todd, 1999). We examined the learning of three cue parameters defining different orders: discrimination rate (DR) (the probability that a cue points to a unique choice), validity (the probability of correct choice given that a cue discriminates), and success (the probability of correct choice). Success orderings are identical to those by expected information gain (Klayman & Ha, 1987). In two experiments, participants made choices in real-world environments with objective outcome criteria. Participant ratings indicated some appropriate parameter learning when the relevant cue parameter values were highly dispersed. Rated orders of cue validity and DR were less distinct than the objective orders—learning one parameter may be biased towards success by variation in the other. Success ratings capture the variation in validity and DR as well as participants' perception of these parameters.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages29
JournalThinking & Reasoning
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Cues
Learning
Heuristics
Discrimination
Discrimination (Psychology)
Rating

Cite this

Simple heuristics from the Adaptive Toolbox: Can we perform the requisite learning? / Rakow, Tim; Hinvest, Neal; Jackson, Edward; Palmer, Martin.

In: Thinking & Reasoning, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2004, p. 1-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rakow, Tim ; Hinvest, Neal ; Jackson, Edward ; Palmer, Martin. / Simple heuristics from the Adaptive Toolbox: Can we perform the requisite learning?. In: Thinking & Reasoning. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 1-29.
@article{2094c53243d84976a19d08f51103efe1,
title = "Simple heuristics from the Adaptive Toolbox: Can we perform the requisite learning?",
abstract = "The Adaptive Toolbox framework specifies heuristics for choice and categorisation that search through cues in previously learned orders (Gigerenzer & Todd, 1999). We examined the learning of three cue parameters defining different orders: discrimination rate (DR) (the probability that a cue points to a unique choice), validity (the probability of correct choice given that a cue discriminates), and success (the probability of correct choice). Success orderings are identical to those by expected information gain (Klayman & Ha, 1987). In two experiments, participants made choices in real-world environments with objective outcome criteria. Participant ratings indicated some appropriate parameter learning when the relevant cue parameter values were highly dispersed. Rated orders of cue validity and DR were less distinct than the objective orders—learning one parameter may be biased towards success by variation in the other. Success ratings capture the variation in validity and DR as well as participants' perception of these parameters.",
author = "Tim Rakow and Neal Hinvest and Edward Jackson and Martin Palmer",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1080/13546780342000016",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--29",
journal = "Thinking & Reasoning",
issn = "1354-6783",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simple heuristics from the Adaptive Toolbox: Can we perform the requisite learning?

AU - Rakow, Tim

AU - Hinvest, Neal

AU - Jackson, Edward

AU - Palmer, Martin

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The Adaptive Toolbox framework specifies heuristics for choice and categorisation that search through cues in previously learned orders (Gigerenzer & Todd, 1999). We examined the learning of three cue parameters defining different orders: discrimination rate (DR) (the probability that a cue points to a unique choice), validity (the probability of correct choice given that a cue discriminates), and success (the probability of correct choice). Success orderings are identical to those by expected information gain (Klayman & Ha, 1987). In two experiments, participants made choices in real-world environments with objective outcome criteria. Participant ratings indicated some appropriate parameter learning when the relevant cue parameter values were highly dispersed. Rated orders of cue validity and DR were less distinct than the objective orders—learning one parameter may be biased towards success by variation in the other. Success ratings capture the variation in validity and DR as well as participants' perception of these parameters.

AB - The Adaptive Toolbox framework specifies heuristics for choice and categorisation that search through cues in previously learned orders (Gigerenzer & Todd, 1999). We examined the learning of three cue parameters defining different orders: discrimination rate (DR) (the probability that a cue points to a unique choice), validity (the probability of correct choice given that a cue discriminates), and success (the probability of correct choice). Success orderings are identical to those by expected information gain (Klayman & Ha, 1987). In two experiments, participants made choices in real-world environments with objective outcome criteria. Participant ratings indicated some appropriate parameter learning when the relevant cue parameter values were highly dispersed. Rated orders of cue validity and DR were less distinct than the objective orders—learning one parameter may be biased towards success by variation in the other. Success ratings capture the variation in validity and DR as well as participants' perception of these parameters.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546780342000016

U2 - 10.1080/13546780342000016

DO - 10.1080/13546780342000016

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 29

JO - Thinking & Reasoning

JF - Thinking & Reasoning

SN - 1354-6783

IS - 1

ER -