Similarities in human visual and declared measures of preference for opposite-sex faces

Jack A. F. Griffey, Anthony C. Little

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Facial appearance in humans is associated with attraction and mate choice. Numerous studies have identified that adults display directional preferences for certain facial traits including symmetry, averageness, and sexually dimorphic traits. Typically, studies measuring human preference for these traits examine declared (e.g., choice or ratings of attractiveness) or visual preferences (e.g., looking time) of participants. However, the extent to which visual and declared preferences correspond remains relatively untested. In order to evaluate the relationship between these measures we examined visual and declared preferences displayed by men and women for opposite-sex faces manipulated across three dimensions (symmetry, averageness, and masculinity) and compared preferences from each method. Results indicated that participants displayed significant visual and declared preferences for symmetrical, average, and appropriately sexually dimorphic faces. We also found that declared and visual preferences correlated weakly but significantly. These data indicate that visual and declared preferences for manipulated facial stimuli produce similar directional preferences across participants and are also correlated with one another within participants. Both methods therefore may be considered appropriate to measure human preferences. However, while both methods appear likely to generate similar patterns of preference at the sample level, the weak nature of the correlation between visual and declared preferences in our data suggests some caution in assuming visual preferences are the same as declared preferences at the individual level. Because there are positive and negative factors in both methods for measuring preference, we suggest that a combined approach is most useful in outlining population level preferences for traits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-309
Number of pages9
JournalExperimental Psychology
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Masculinity
Population
Symmetry
Attractiveness
Stimulus
Rating
Attraction
Mate

Keywords

  • Attractiveness
  • Eye-tracking
  • Faces
  • Mate choice
  • Preference

Cite this

Similarities in human visual and declared measures of preference for opposite-sex faces. / Griffey, Jack A. F.; Little, Anthony C.

In: Experimental Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 4, 12.2014, p. 301-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2486291b38734a4a826d4f2d328c52e1,
title = "Similarities in human visual and declared measures of preference for opposite-sex faces",
abstract = "Facial appearance in humans is associated with attraction and mate choice. Numerous studies have identified that adults display directional preferences for certain facial traits including symmetry, averageness, and sexually dimorphic traits. Typically, studies measuring human preference for these traits examine declared (e.g., choice or ratings of attractiveness) or visual preferences (e.g., looking time) of participants. However, the extent to which visual and declared preferences correspond remains relatively untested. In order to evaluate the relationship between these measures we examined visual and declared preferences displayed by men and women for opposite-sex faces manipulated across three dimensions (symmetry, averageness, and masculinity) and compared preferences from each method. Results indicated that participants displayed significant visual and declared preferences for symmetrical, average, and appropriately sexually dimorphic faces. We also found that declared and visual preferences correlated weakly but significantly. These data indicate that visual and declared preferences for manipulated facial stimuli produce similar directional preferences across participants and are also correlated with one another within participants. Both methods therefore may be considered appropriate to measure human preferences. However, while both methods appear likely to generate similar patterns of preference at the sample level, the weak nature of the correlation between visual and declared preferences in our data suggests some caution in assuming visual preferences are the same as declared preferences at the individual level. Because there are positive and negative factors in both methods for measuring preference, we suggest that a combined approach is most useful in outlining population level preferences for traits.",
keywords = "Attractiveness, Eye-tracking, Faces, Mate choice, Preference",
author = "Griffey, {Jack A. F.} and Little, {Anthony C.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1027/1618-3169/a000248",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "301--309",
journal = "Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1618-3169",
publisher = "Hogrefe",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Similarities in human visual and declared measures of preference for opposite-sex faces

AU - Griffey, Jack A. F.

AU - Little, Anthony C.

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - Facial appearance in humans is associated with attraction and mate choice. Numerous studies have identified that adults display directional preferences for certain facial traits including symmetry, averageness, and sexually dimorphic traits. Typically, studies measuring human preference for these traits examine declared (e.g., choice or ratings of attractiveness) or visual preferences (e.g., looking time) of participants. However, the extent to which visual and declared preferences correspond remains relatively untested. In order to evaluate the relationship between these measures we examined visual and declared preferences displayed by men and women for opposite-sex faces manipulated across three dimensions (symmetry, averageness, and masculinity) and compared preferences from each method. Results indicated that participants displayed significant visual and declared preferences for symmetrical, average, and appropriately sexually dimorphic faces. We also found that declared and visual preferences correlated weakly but significantly. These data indicate that visual and declared preferences for manipulated facial stimuli produce similar directional preferences across participants and are also correlated with one another within participants. Both methods therefore may be considered appropriate to measure human preferences. However, while both methods appear likely to generate similar patterns of preference at the sample level, the weak nature of the correlation between visual and declared preferences in our data suggests some caution in assuming visual preferences are the same as declared preferences at the individual level. Because there are positive and negative factors in both methods for measuring preference, we suggest that a combined approach is most useful in outlining population level preferences for traits.

AB - Facial appearance in humans is associated with attraction and mate choice. Numerous studies have identified that adults display directional preferences for certain facial traits including symmetry, averageness, and sexually dimorphic traits. Typically, studies measuring human preference for these traits examine declared (e.g., choice or ratings of attractiveness) or visual preferences (e.g., looking time) of participants. However, the extent to which visual and declared preferences correspond remains relatively untested. In order to evaluate the relationship between these measures we examined visual and declared preferences displayed by men and women for opposite-sex faces manipulated across three dimensions (symmetry, averageness, and masculinity) and compared preferences from each method. Results indicated that participants displayed significant visual and declared preferences for symmetrical, average, and appropriately sexually dimorphic faces. We also found that declared and visual preferences correlated weakly but significantly. These data indicate that visual and declared preferences for manipulated facial stimuli produce similar directional preferences across participants and are also correlated with one another within participants. Both methods therefore may be considered appropriate to measure human preferences. However, while both methods appear likely to generate similar patterns of preference at the sample level, the weak nature of the correlation between visual and declared preferences in our data suggests some caution in assuming visual preferences are the same as declared preferences at the individual level. Because there are positive and negative factors in both methods for measuring preference, we suggest that a combined approach is most useful in outlining population level preferences for traits.

KW - Attractiveness

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Faces

KW - Mate choice

KW - Preference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910119198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000248

U2 - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000248

DO - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000248

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 301

EP - 309

JO - Experimental Psychology

JF - Experimental Psychology

SN - 1618-3169

IS - 4

ER -