Abstract
Cartesian mind‐body dualism, while often explicitly denied, has left a legacy of conceptions that remain highly influential in education. I argue that trends in both analytic and continental philosophy of language point towards a post‐Cartesian settlement in which the distinction between ‘signs’ and ‘signals’ is collapsed, and which thus construes all living (and learning) as semiotic engagement. I begin to explore the implications of such a view for learning theory, teaching and the curriculum, educational and social research, and broader social policy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 373-387 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Curriculum Studies |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sign(al)s: Living and Learning as Semiotic Engagement (text of inaugural lecture delivered 30/11/2005)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS