Signals are informative but slow down responses when drivers meet bicyclists at road junctions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three experiments used a laboratory analogue to the task of driving to took at drivers' responses to encounters with a bicyclist at a T-junction. In particular, a comparison was made between the bicyclist indicating an upcoming turn with an arm signal, an informal signal of intent, or no signal. Overall, arm signals worked relatively well to inform drivers of the bicyclist's intentions and were easier to perceive than informal signals. It was also found that simple failures to react to the bicyclist in time were more common at shorter thinking times whereas incorrect positive responses were unaffected by thinking time. Most interestingly, these experiments showed that arm signals often slowed down the participants' decision-making processes, leading to a lower probability of their stopping in time when the bicyclist was at risk. Moreover, the same was true for informal signals in which there was eye-contact between the bicyclist and the participant. It is suggested that these effects come about because both arm signals and eye-contact are communicative acts and therefore invoke extra stages of involuntary cognitive processing in the drivers, thereby slowing their reactions. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1074-1085
Number of pages12
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

driver
road
Decision making
Experiments
contact
experiment
Processing
decision-making process
Decision Making
time
Thinking

Cite this

Signals are informative but slow down responses when drivers meet bicyclists at road junctions. / Walker, I.

In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2005, p. 1074-1085.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9784beb2ea9843e49328330f45003bbc,
title = "Signals are informative but slow down responses when drivers meet bicyclists at road junctions",
abstract = "Three experiments used a laboratory analogue to the task of driving to took at drivers' responses to encounters with a bicyclist at a T-junction. In particular, a comparison was made between the bicyclist indicating an upcoming turn with an arm signal, an informal signal of intent, or no signal. Overall, arm signals worked relatively well to inform drivers of the bicyclist's intentions and were easier to perceive than informal signals. It was also found that simple failures to react to the bicyclist in time were more common at shorter thinking times whereas incorrect positive responses were unaffected by thinking time. Most interestingly, these experiments showed that arm signals often slowed down the participants' decision-making processes, leading to a lower probability of their stopping in time when the bicyclist was at risk. Moreover, the same was true for informal signals in which there was eye-contact between the bicyclist and the participant. It is suggested that these effects come about because both arm signals and eye-contact are communicative acts and therefore invoke extra stages of involuntary cognitive processing in the drivers, thereby slowing their reactions. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.",
author = "I Walker",
note = "ID number: ISI:000233183200013",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.005",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1074--1085",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signals are informative but slow down responses when drivers meet bicyclists at road junctions

AU - Walker, I

N1 - ID number: ISI:000233183200013

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Three experiments used a laboratory analogue to the task of driving to took at drivers' responses to encounters with a bicyclist at a T-junction. In particular, a comparison was made between the bicyclist indicating an upcoming turn with an arm signal, an informal signal of intent, or no signal. Overall, arm signals worked relatively well to inform drivers of the bicyclist's intentions and were easier to perceive than informal signals. It was also found that simple failures to react to the bicyclist in time were more common at shorter thinking times whereas incorrect positive responses were unaffected by thinking time. Most interestingly, these experiments showed that arm signals often slowed down the participants' decision-making processes, leading to a lower probability of their stopping in time when the bicyclist was at risk. Moreover, the same was true for informal signals in which there was eye-contact between the bicyclist and the participant. It is suggested that these effects come about because both arm signals and eye-contact are communicative acts and therefore invoke extra stages of involuntary cognitive processing in the drivers, thereby slowing their reactions. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

AB - Three experiments used a laboratory analogue to the task of driving to took at drivers' responses to encounters with a bicyclist at a T-junction. In particular, a comparison was made between the bicyclist indicating an upcoming turn with an arm signal, an informal signal of intent, or no signal. Overall, arm signals worked relatively well to inform drivers of the bicyclist's intentions and were easier to perceive than informal signals. It was also found that simple failures to react to the bicyclist in time were more common at shorter thinking times whereas incorrect positive responses were unaffected by thinking time. Most interestingly, these experiments showed that arm signals often slowed down the participants' decision-making processes, leading to a lower probability of their stopping in time when the bicyclist was at risk. Moreover, the same was true for informal signals in which there was eye-contact between the bicyclist and the participant. It is suggested that these effects come about because both arm signals and eye-contact are communicative acts and therefore invoke extra stages of involuntary cognitive processing in the drivers, thereby slowing their reactions. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.005

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1074

EP - 1085

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

IS - 6

ER -