Should I stay or should I go? – Exploring relative drivers of employee early-exit from the NHS.

Andrew Weyman, Deborah Roy

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Shortages of suitably qualified health professionals prepared to work in the NHS are not a new phenomenon. However, there are increasingly widespread claims that the NHS faces the prospect of unprecedented shortages over the next decade. Causal vectors present as multiple, having variously been attributed to changes in training bursaries e.g. nurses; rises in job-demands; budgetary cuts; changes to contractual arrangements, e.g. junior doctors; uncertainty over Brexit implications; and more. Prim face implications relate to training, recruitment and retention.
This paper is focused on issues of relevance to staff retention.
As a component of our Medical Research Council funded Research ‘Extending Working Lives in the NHS: Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects’, an opportunity sample of NHS employees (N=1605) completed a paired comparisons exercise on variables identified as representing headline ‘push’ influences in employee early exit.
The ratio scale produced by the method of paired comparisons affords a number of advantages over alternatives, e.g. direct ranking or rating scales. Specially, it provided a means of demonstrating the relative distance (importance/salience) between the variables being ranked. It also permitted formal testing of the degree of concordance (shared view) for the sample as a whole and, critically from the perspective of segmented intervention, the degree to which different employee demographics (by profession/role/grade) can be considered to share discrete ‘push’ profiles. Findings indicate the primacy of variables relating to extrinsic components of job demands.
The implications of our findings from the perspective of intervention to increase rates of NHS staff retention are discussed.


Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventAnnual Conference of British Psychological Society 2017 - Brighton Hilton Metropole, Brighton, UK United Kingdom
Duration: 3 May 20175 May 2017
Conference number: AC2017

Conference

ConferenceAnnual Conference of British Psychological Society 2017
Abbreviated titleAnnual BPS Conference
CountryUK United Kingdom
CityBrighton
Period3/05/175/05/17

Fingerprint

job demand
driver
employee
shortage
staff
comparison of methods
medical research
working life
rating scale
health professionals
ranking
nurse
profession
uncertainty
present

Cite this

Weyman, A., & Roy, D. (2016). Should I stay or should I go? – Exploring relative drivers of employee early-exit from the NHS.. Paper presented at Annual Conference of British Psychological Society 2017, Brighton, UK United Kingdom.

Should I stay or should I go? – Exploring relative drivers of employee early-exit from the NHS. / Weyman, Andrew; Roy, Deborah.

2016. Paper presented at Annual Conference of British Psychological Society 2017, Brighton, UK United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Weyman, A & Roy, D 2016, 'Should I stay or should I go? – Exploring relative drivers of employee early-exit from the NHS.' Paper presented at Annual Conference of British Psychological Society 2017, Brighton, UK United Kingdom, 3/05/17 - 5/05/17, .
Weyman A, Roy D. Should I stay or should I go? – Exploring relative drivers of employee early-exit from the NHS.. 2016. Paper presented at Annual Conference of British Psychological Society 2017, Brighton, UK United Kingdom.
Weyman, Andrew ; Roy, Deborah. / Should I stay or should I go? – Exploring relative drivers of employee early-exit from the NHS. Paper presented at Annual Conference of British Psychological Society 2017, Brighton, UK United Kingdom.
@conference{58255f8cafa84d7895686d2c60636e2c,
title = "Should I stay or should I go? – Exploring relative drivers of employee early-exit from the NHS.",
abstract = "Shortages of suitably qualified health professionals prepared to work in the NHS are not a new phenomenon. However, there are increasingly widespread claims that the NHS faces the prospect of unprecedented shortages over the next decade. Causal vectors present as multiple, having variously been attributed to changes in training bursaries e.g. nurses; rises in job-demands; budgetary cuts; changes to contractual arrangements, e.g. junior doctors; uncertainty over Brexit implications; and more. Prim face implications relate to training, recruitment and retention. This paper is focused on issues of relevance to staff retention. As a component of our Medical Research Council funded Research ‘Extending Working Lives in the NHS: Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects’, an opportunity sample of NHS employees (N=1605) completed a paired comparisons exercise on variables identified as representing headline ‘push’ influences in employee early exit. The ratio scale produced by the method of paired comparisons affords a number of advantages over alternatives, e.g. direct ranking or rating scales. Specially, it provided a means of demonstrating the relative distance (importance/salience) between the variables being ranked. It also permitted formal testing of the degree of concordance (shared view) for the sample as a whole and, critically from the perspective of segmented intervention, the degree to which different employee demographics (by profession/role/grade) can be considered to share discrete ‘push’ profiles. Findings indicate the primacy of variables relating to extrinsic components of job demands.The implications of our findings from the perspective of intervention to increase rates of NHS staff retention are discussed.",
author = "Andrew Weyman and Deborah Roy",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
note = "Annual Conference of British Psychological Society 2017, Annual BPS Conference ; Conference date: 03-05-2017 Through 05-05-2017",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Should I stay or should I go? – Exploring relative drivers of employee early-exit from the NHS.

AU - Weyman, Andrew

AU - Roy, Deborah

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Shortages of suitably qualified health professionals prepared to work in the NHS are not a new phenomenon. However, there are increasingly widespread claims that the NHS faces the prospect of unprecedented shortages over the next decade. Causal vectors present as multiple, having variously been attributed to changes in training bursaries e.g. nurses; rises in job-demands; budgetary cuts; changes to contractual arrangements, e.g. junior doctors; uncertainty over Brexit implications; and more. Prim face implications relate to training, recruitment and retention. This paper is focused on issues of relevance to staff retention. As a component of our Medical Research Council funded Research ‘Extending Working Lives in the NHS: Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects’, an opportunity sample of NHS employees (N=1605) completed a paired comparisons exercise on variables identified as representing headline ‘push’ influences in employee early exit. The ratio scale produced by the method of paired comparisons affords a number of advantages over alternatives, e.g. direct ranking or rating scales. Specially, it provided a means of demonstrating the relative distance (importance/salience) between the variables being ranked. It also permitted formal testing of the degree of concordance (shared view) for the sample as a whole and, critically from the perspective of segmented intervention, the degree to which different employee demographics (by profession/role/grade) can be considered to share discrete ‘push’ profiles. Findings indicate the primacy of variables relating to extrinsic components of job demands.The implications of our findings from the perspective of intervention to increase rates of NHS staff retention are discussed.

AB - Shortages of suitably qualified health professionals prepared to work in the NHS are not a new phenomenon. However, there are increasingly widespread claims that the NHS faces the prospect of unprecedented shortages over the next decade. Causal vectors present as multiple, having variously been attributed to changes in training bursaries e.g. nurses; rises in job-demands; budgetary cuts; changes to contractual arrangements, e.g. junior doctors; uncertainty over Brexit implications; and more. Prim face implications relate to training, recruitment and retention. This paper is focused on issues of relevance to staff retention. As a component of our Medical Research Council funded Research ‘Extending Working Lives in the NHS: Opportunities, Challenges and Prospects’, an opportunity sample of NHS employees (N=1605) completed a paired comparisons exercise on variables identified as representing headline ‘push’ influences in employee early exit. The ratio scale produced by the method of paired comparisons affords a number of advantages over alternatives, e.g. direct ranking or rating scales. Specially, it provided a means of demonstrating the relative distance (importance/salience) between the variables being ranked. It also permitted formal testing of the degree of concordance (shared view) for the sample as a whole and, critically from the perspective of segmented intervention, the degree to which different employee demographics (by profession/role/grade) can be considered to share discrete ‘push’ profiles. Findings indicate the primacy of variables relating to extrinsic components of job demands.The implications of our findings from the perspective of intervention to increase rates of NHS staff retention are discussed.

M3 - Paper

ER -