Abstract
We provide novel evidence showing that shareholder litigation risk influences firms' choices of external growth strategies. Using staggered adoption of universal demand (UD) laws, we find that firms under the threat of litigation tend to choose corporate alliances over mergers and acquisitions (M&As). This finding supports the view that alliances offer a low-risk and low-cost alternative to M&As for firms facing litigation risk. Moreover, alliance performance improves after the passage of UD laws, suggesting that firms can make better deal selections under reduced litigation threats. Overall, we establish an unexplored link between litigation risk and firms' choices of boundary-expanding transactions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 574 - 614 |
Number of pages | 41 |
Journal | Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 11 Mar 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Mar 2023 |
Acknowledgements
We thank Christopher Baum, Andriy Bodnaruk (the referee), Mark Clatworthy, Eliezer Fich, Jarrad Harford (the editor), Tuan Ho, A. Can Inci, Andrew Karolyi, Elisabeth Kempf, Hyunseob Kim, Kirak Kim, Alberto Manconi, Kasper Meisner Nielsen, Manuela Pedio, and Silvina Rubio, and the conference and seminar participants at the 2019 Financial Management Association (FMA) Annual Meeting, the 2019 European Financial Management Association (EFMA) Annual Meeting, the 2019 Young Finance Scholars conference, and the University of Bristol for their insightful comments and suggestions. All errors are our own.Keywords
- UD laws
- corporate alliances
- mergers and acquisitions
- shareholder litigation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics