Separation control versus circulation control for loads alleviation of plunging unswept and swept Wings

The frequency responses of circulation control and separation control using mini-spoilers for loads attenuation on plunging swept and unswept wings were compared in a water tunnel study. At the pre-stall angle-of-attack, the effectiveness of the spoilers significantly diminishes with increasing reduced frequency of the plunging motion. For the leading-edge spoiler, this happens because the roll-up of the vorticity promotes flow reattachment and reduces the effectiveness of loads attenuation. For the trailing-edge spoiler, the effectiveness of lift attenuation also decreases with increasing reduced frequency, due to the shedding of leading-edge vortices and immersion of the trailing-edge spoiler in the separated flow. The decay of the frequency response for both types of spoilers is similar, implying that it is dictated by the flow separation near the leading edge of the wing in both cases. With increasing sweep angle of the wings, the spoilers’ effectiveness decreases significantly in comparison to the unswept wing. Strong spanwise flow develops for the leading-edge spoiler, which sheds a streamwise vortex, with the same direction of rotation as the wing-tip trailing vortex. This causes partial reattachment of the flow and reduction of the separation area behind the spoiler. With increasing reduced frequency, strong leading-edge vortices dominate the flow over the wing. The leading-edge vortices generate additional vortex lift and also cause the trailing-edge spoiler to be immersed in the massively separated flows. Both factors reduce the effectiveness of the spoilers.