Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation

Gerardo Patriotta; Andrew D. Brown

doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002

Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation

Gerardo Patriotta, Andrew D. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the linkages between sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation in an organizational setting. Drawing on a study of how university students prepared for examinations, it argues that one way people make sense of being evaluated is through metaphors that conventionalize reality and thus contribute to the maintenance of continuity in everyday social action. This is because metaphorical understandings assist people's effort to assign events and situations to familiar categories and thereby turn the 'unusual' into 'business as usual'. Moreover, metaphors are cognitive and more broadly power-laden social resources, which individuals and groups employ in determining how to make sense of and deal with potentially unsettling events such as performance evaluations.

Language	English
Pages	34-43
Number of pages	10
Journal	Scandinavian Journal of Management
Volume	27
Issue number	1
DOIs	10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002
Status	Published - 1 Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Metaphor

Maintenance

Students

Sensemaking

Performance evaluation

Cite this

Patriotta, G., & Brown, A. D. (2011). Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002

Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation. / Patriotta, Gerardo; Brown, Andrew D.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.03.2011, p. 34-43.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Patriotta, G & Brown, AD 2011, 'Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation', Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002

Patriotta G, Brown AD. Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2011 Mar 1;27(1):34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002

Patriotta, Gerardo ; Brown, Andrew D. / Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation. In: Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2011 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 34-43.

@article{5d6da57025c74981a8ffa28ba6f20c03,

title = "Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation",

abstract = "This paper analyzes the linkages between sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation in an organizational setting. Drawing on a study of how university students prepared for examinations, it argues that one way people make sense of being evaluated is through metaphors that conventionalize reality and thus contribute to the maintenance of continuity in everyday social action. This is because metaphorical understandings assist people's effort to assign events and situations to familiar categories and thereby turn the 'unusual' into 'business as usual'. Moreover, metaphors are cognitive and more broadly power-laden social resources, which individuals and groups employ in determining how to make sense of and deal with potentially unsettling events such as performance evaluations.",

author = "Gerardo Patriotta and Brown, {Andrew D.}",

year = "2011",

month = "3",

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "34--43",

journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Management",

issn = "0956-5221",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation

AU - Patriotta, Gerardo

AU - Brown, Andrew D.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - This paper analyzes the linkages between sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation in an organizational setting. Drawing on a study of how university students prepared for examinations, it argues that one way people make sense of being evaluated is through metaphors that conventionalize reality and thus contribute to the maintenance of continuity in everyday social action. This is because metaphorical understandings assist people's effort to assign events and situations to familiar categories and thereby turn the 'unusual' into 'business as usual'. Moreover, metaphors are cognitive and more broadly power-laden social resources, which individuals and groups employ in determining how to make sense of and deal with potentially unsettling events such as performance evaluations.

AB - This paper analyzes the linkages between sensemaking, metaphors and performance evaluation in an organizational setting. Drawing on a study of how university students prepared for examinations, it argues that one way people make sense of being evaluated is through metaphors that conventionalize reality and thus contribute to the maintenance of continuity in everyday social action. This is because metaphorical understandings assist people's effort to assign events and situations to familiar categories and thereby turn the 'unusual' into 'business as usual'. Moreover, metaphors are cognitive and more broadly power-laden social resources, which individuals and groups employ in determining how to make sense of and deal with potentially unsettling events such as performance evaluations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951512144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002

U2 - 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 34

EP - 43

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Management

T2 - Scandinavian Journal of Management

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Management

SN - 0956-5221

IS - 1

ER -

Access to Document

10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.002