Selling impact: How is impact peer reviewed and what does this mean for the future of impact in universities?

Richard Watermeyer; Adam  Hedgecoe

Selling impact: How is impact peer reviewed and what does this mean for the future of impact in universities?

Richard Watermeyer
, Adam Hedgecoe

Cardiff University

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

Original language	English
Specialist publication	LSE Impact of Social Sciences Blog
Publication status	Published - 5 May 2016

Access to Document

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/05/05/selling-impact-peer-reviewer-estimations-of-what-counts-and-what-is-needed-in-ref-impact-submissions/

Cite this

TY - GEN

T1 - Selling impact

T2 - How is impact peer reviewed and what does this mean for the future of impact in universities?

AU - Watermeyer, Richard

AU - Hedgecoe, Adam

PY - 2016/5/5

Y1 - 2016/5/5

UR - http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/05/05/selling-impact-peer-reviewer-estimations-of-what-counts-and-what-is-needed-in-ref-impact-submissions/

M3 - Article

JO - LSE Impact of Social Sciences Blog

JF - LSE Impact of Social Sciences Blog

ER -

Selling impact: How is impact peer reviewed and what does this mean for the future of impact in universities?

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this