Abstract
In 2011, the UK government recognized the lack of corporate board diversity as an economic and social problem. This led to the establishment of a high-level review process that set a voluntary target of 25% female board members in FTSE 100 companies by 2015. A second review process set the target of 33% by the end of 2020. Although the 33% target was met by that date, and companies are more likely to include equality and diversity statements in their annual reporting, the chapter argues that a number of weaknesses still hinder the full potential of the British voluntary approach: women are still much more likely to be non-executive directors than executive ones; women rarely reach the CEO position; the change outside the 100 biggest companies is slow; female business leadership has not significantly expanded. By adhering at an early stage to voluntary self-regulation, the British review process has closed off the possibility of more stringent enforcement and loosened disincentives for resistance to change, thus limiting any gender transformative potential of these policy efforts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Gender equality and policy implementation in the corporate world |
| Subtitle of host publication | Making democracy work in business |
| Editors | Isabelle Engeli, Amy Mazur |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 59-85 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191897597 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-0-19-886521-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 May 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self-regulation comes at a cost: closing off authoritative policy for gender equality on corporate boards in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS