Self and team prioritisation effects in perceptual matching: Evidence for a shared representation

Florence Enock, Jie Sui, Miles Hewstone, Glyn William Humphreys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that in-group favouritism occurs not only in higher-level judgments such as reward allocation, but also in low-level perceptual and attentional tasks. Recently, Moradi, Sui, Hewstone, and Humphreys (2015) found a novel effect of in-group bias on a simple perceptual matching task in which football fans responded more efficiently to stimuli newly associated with their own football team than stimuli associated with rival or neutral teams. This result is consistent with a robust self-bias effect in which individuals show a large performance advantage in responding to stimuli associated with the self over stimuli associated with a close friend or a stranger (Sui, He, & Humphreys, 2012). The present research utilised a perceptual matching paradigm to investigate the relations between self and in-group prioritisation amongst a sample of college rowers. Across two experiments, we demonstrated a reliable performance advantage for self and team stimuli. We also found a relationship between the self and team advantage in RT, and demonstrated an overlap in the perception of self- and team-associated shapes that was stronger in participants who reported a greater sense of group identity with their team. Further, we found no relation between the team bias and positive valence implicitly associated with the team, showing that the team bias effects are unlikely to be driven by emotional significance. The results are consistent with an overlap between self and in-group representation, which may provide evidence for a common process driving both self and in-group perceptual advantage effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-118
Number of pages12
JournalActa Neuropsychologica
Volume182
Early online date20 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Football
Reward
Research

Keywords

  • In-group prioritisation
  • Self representation
  • Self-bias
  • Social attention
  • Social identity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Self and team prioritisation effects in perceptual matching: Evidence for a shared representation. / Enock, Florence; Sui, Jie; Hewstone, Miles; Humphreys, Glyn William.

In: Acta Neuropsychologica, Vol. 182, 01.01.2018, p. 107-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Enock, Florence ; Sui, Jie ; Hewstone, Miles ; Humphreys, Glyn William. / Self and team prioritisation effects in perceptual matching: Evidence for a shared representation. In: Acta Neuropsychologica. 2018 ; Vol. 182. pp. 107-118.
@article{5b49cc379c89400092764508be67f6e3,
title = "Self and team prioritisation effects in perceptual matching:: Evidence for a shared representation",
abstract = "Previous research has demonstrated that in-group favouritism occurs not only in higher-level judgments such as reward allocation, but also in low-level perceptual and attentional tasks. Recently, Moradi, Sui, Hewstone, and Humphreys (2015) found a novel effect of in-group bias on a simple perceptual matching task in which football fans responded more efficiently to stimuli newly associated with their own football team than stimuli associated with rival or neutral teams. This result is consistent with a robust self-bias effect in which individuals show a large performance advantage in responding to stimuli associated with the self over stimuli associated with a close friend or a stranger (Sui, He, & Humphreys, 2012). The present research utilised a perceptual matching paradigm to investigate the relations between self and in-group prioritisation amongst a sample of college rowers. Across two experiments, we demonstrated a reliable performance advantage for self and team stimuli. We also found a relationship between the self and team advantage in RT, and demonstrated an overlap in the perception of self- and team-associated shapes that was stronger in participants who reported a greater sense of group identity with their team. Further, we found no relation between the team bias and positive valence implicitly associated with the team, showing that the team bias effects are unlikely to be driven by emotional significance. The results are consistent with an overlap between self and in-group representation, which may provide evidence for a common process driving both self and in-group perceptual advantage effects.",
keywords = "In-group prioritisation, Self representation, Self-bias, Social attention, Social identity",
author = "Florence Enock and Jie Sui and Miles Hewstone and Humphreys, {Glyn William}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.011",
language = "English",
volume = "182",
pages = "107--118",
journal = "Acta Neuropsychologica",
issn = "1730-7503",
publisher = "Agencja Wydawnicza Medsportpress",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self and team prioritisation effects in perceptual matching:

T2 - Evidence for a shared representation

AU - Enock, Florence

AU - Sui, Jie

AU - Hewstone, Miles

AU - Humphreys, Glyn William

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Previous research has demonstrated that in-group favouritism occurs not only in higher-level judgments such as reward allocation, but also in low-level perceptual and attentional tasks. Recently, Moradi, Sui, Hewstone, and Humphreys (2015) found a novel effect of in-group bias on a simple perceptual matching task in which football fans responded more efficiently to stimuli newly associated with their own football team than stimuli associated with rival or neutral teams. This result is consistent with a robust self-bias effect in which individuals show a large performance advantage in responding to stimuli associated with the self over stimuli associated with a close friend or a stranger (Sui, He, & Humphreys, 2012). The present research utilised a perceptual matching paradigm to investigate the relations between self and in-group prioritisation amongst a sample of college rowers. Across two experiments, we demonstrated a reliable performance advantage for self and team stimuli. We also found a relationship between the self and team advantage in RT, and demonstrated an overlap in the perception of self- and team-associated shapes that was stronger in participants who reported a greater sense of group identity with their team. Further, we found no relation between the team bias and positive valence implicitly associated with the team, showing that the team bias effects are unlikely to be driven by emotional significance. The results are consistent with an overlap between self and in-group representation, which may provide evidence for a common process driving both self and in-group perceptual advantage effects.

AB - Previous research has demonstrated that in-group favouritism occurs not only in higher-level judgments such as reward allocation, but also in low-level perceptual and attentional tasks. Recently, Moradi, Sui, Hewstone, and Humphreys (2015) found a novel effect of in-group bias on a simple perceptual matching task in which football fans responded more efficiently to stimuli newly associated with their own football team than stimuli associated with rival or neutral teams. This result is consistent with a robust self-bias effect in which individuals show a large performance advantage in responding to stimuli associated with the self over stimuli associated with a close friend or a stranger (Sui, He, & Humphreys, 2012). The present research utilised a perceptual matching paradigm to investigate the relations between self and in-group prioritisation amongst a sample of college rowers. Across two experiments, we demonstrated a reliable performance advantage for self and team stimuli. We also found a relationship between the self and team advantage in RT, and demonstrated an overlap in the perception of self- and team-associated shapes that was stronger in participants who reported a greater sense of group identity with their team. Further, we found no relation between the team bias and positive valence implicitly associated with the team, showing that the team bias effects are unlikely to be driven by emotional significance. The results are consistent with an overlap between self and in-group representation, which may provide evidence for a common process driving both self and in-group perceptual advantage effects.

KW - In-group prioritisation

KW - Self representation

KW - Self-bias

KW - Social attention

KW - Social identity

UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.011

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034218246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.011

M3 - Article

VL - 182

SP - 107

EP - 118

JO - Acta Neuropsychologica

JF - Acta Neuropsychologica

SN - 1730-7503

ER -