Selective abortion and the evolution of genomic imprinting

J B Wolf, R Hager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mothers can determine which genotypes of offspring they will produce through selective abortion or selective implantation. This process can, at some loci, favour matching between maternal and offspring genotype whereas at other loci mismatching may be favoured (e.g. MHC, HLA). Genomic imprinting generally renders gene expression monoallelic and could thus be adaptive at loci where matching or mismatching is beneficial. This hypothesis, however, remains unexplored despite evidence that loci known to play a role in genetic compatibility may be imprinted. We develop a simple model demonstrating that, when matching is beneficial, imprinting with maternal expression is adaptive because the incompatible paternal allele is not detected, protecting offspring from selective abortion. Conversely, when mismatching is beneficial, imprinting with paternal expression is adaptive because the maternal genotype is more able to identify the presence of a foreign allele in offspring. Thus, imprinting may act as a genomic 'cloaking device' during critical periods in development when selective abortion is possible.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2519-2523
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

imprinting
genomic imprinting
genomics
loci
genotype
allele
alleles
gene expression

Cite this

Selective abortion and the evolution of genomic imprinting. / Wolf, J B; Hager, R.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 22, No. 12, 2009, p. 2519-2523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0cc1eabe65d1485992050b1103579340,
title = "Selective abortion and the evolution of genomic imprinting",
abstract = "Mothers can determine which genotypes of offspring they will produce through selective abortion or selective implantation. This process can, at some loci, favour matching between maternal and offspring genotype whereas at other loci mismatching may be favoured (e.g. MHC, HLA). Genomic imprinting generally renders gene expression monoallelic and could thus be adaptive at loci where matching or mismatching is beneficial. This hypothesis, however, remains unexplored despite evidence that loci known to play a role in genetic compatibility may be imprinted. We develop a simple model demonstrating that, when matching is beneficial, imprinting with maternal expression is adaptive because the incompatible paternal allele is not detected, protecting offspring from selective abortion. Conversely, when mismatching is beneficial, imprinting with paternal expression is adaptive because the maternal genotype is more able to identify the presence of a foreign allele in offspring. Thus, imprinting may act as a genomic 'cloaking device' during critical periods in development when selective abortion is possible.",
author = "Wolf, {J B} and R Hager",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01874.x",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "2519--2523",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Biology",
issn = "1010-061X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selective abortion and the evolution of genomic imprinting

AU - Wolf, J B

AU - Hager, R

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Mothers can determine which genotypes of offspring they will produce through selective abortion or selective implantation. This process can, at some loci, favour matching between maternal and offspring genotype whereas at other loci mismatching may be favoured (e.g. MHC, HLA). Genomic imprinting generally renders gene expression monoallelic and could thus be adaptive at loci where matching or mismatching is beneficial. This hypothesis, however, remains unexplored despite evidence that loci known to play a role in genetic compatibility may be imprinted. We develop a simple model demonstrating that, when matching is beneficial, imprinting with maternal expression is adaptive because the incompatible paternal allele is not detected, protecting offspring from selective abortion. Conversely, when mismatching is beneficial, imprinting with paternal expression is adaptive because the maternal genotype is more able to identify the presence of a foreign allele in offspring. Thus, imprinting may act as a genomic 'cloaking device' during critical periods in development when selective abortion is possible.

AB - Mothers can determine which genotypes of offspring they will produce through selective abortion or selective implantation. This process can, at some loci, favour matching between maternal and offspring genotype whereas at other loci mismatching may be favoured (e.g. MHC, HLA). Genomic imprinting generally renders gene expression monoallelic and could thus be adaptive at loci where matching or mismatching is beneficial. This hypothesis, however, remains unexplored despite evidence that loci known to play a role in genetic compatibility may be imprinted. We develop a simple model demonstrating that, when matching is beneficial, imprinting with maternal expression is adaptive because the incompatible paternal allele is not detected, protecting offspring from selective abortion. Conversely, when mismatching is beneficial, imprinting with paternal expression is adaptive because the maternal genotype is more able to identify the presence of a foreign allele in offspring. Thus, imprinting may act as a genomic 'cloaking device' during critical periods in development when selective abortion is possible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72449173803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01874.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01874.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01874.x

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 2519

EP - 2523

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

SN - 1010-061X

IS - 12

ER -