Selection of ferroelectric ceramics for transducers and electrical energy storage devices

Gaurav Vats; Rahul Vaish; Chris R. Bowen

doi:10.1111/ijac.12168

Selection of ferroelectric ceramics for transducers and electrical energy storage devices

Gaurav Vats, Rahul Vaish, Chris R. Bowen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Citations (SciVal)

198 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The selection of an optimal ferroelectric material according to the user requirements is a crucial as well as onerous task; examples of such requirements include high efficiency, sensitivity, wide operating temperature, and frequency range, compact size, low cost and low loss, etc. In this study, quality function deployment (QFD) in combination with multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) is employed for material selection. Pb_(1-x)La_x)(Zr_yTi) _(1-y))O₃[PLZT (7/60/40)] (lead-based) and (K _0.44Na_0.52Li_0.04)-(Nb _0.84Ta_0.1Sb_0.06)O₃(KNN-LT-LS) (lead-free) are found to be the top-ranked piezoelectric ceramics for transducer applications. PLZT (7/60/40) (lead-based) and 0.7Bi_0.5Na_0.5TiO-₃-0.2Bi_0.5K_0.5TiO₃-0.1(Bi_0.5Li_0.5)TiO₃ (lead-free) are found to be best materials for energy storage applications.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	E1-E7
Journal	International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology
Volume	12
Issue number	S1
Early online date	3 Sep 2013
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12168
Publication status	Published - Jan 2015

Access to Document

10.1111/ijac.12168

Bowen_2013_IJACT
This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Vats, G, Vaish, R & Bowen, CR 2013, 'Selection of ferroelectric ceramics for transducers and electrical energy storage devices' International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12168
Submitted manuscript, 707 KB

Cite this

@article{d6013d1629cf47adb01b711c29a67aa0,

title = "Selection of ferroelectric ceramics for transducers and electrical energy storage devices",

abstract = "The selection of an optimal ferroelectric material according to the user requirements is a crucial as well as onerous task; examples of such requirements include high efficiency, sensitivity, wide operating temperature, and frequency range, compact size, low cost and low loss, etc. In this study, quality function deployment (QFD) in combination with multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) is employed for material selection. Pb(1-x)Lax)(ZryTi) (1-y))O3[PLZT (7/60/40)] (lead-based) and (K 0.44Na0.52Li0.04)-(Nb 0.84Ta0.1Sb0.06)O3(KNN-LT-LS) (lead-free) are found to be the top-ranked piezoelectric ceramics for transducer applications. PLZT (7/60/40) (lead-based) and 0.7Bi0.5Na0.5TiO-3-0.2Bi0.5K0.5TiO3-0.1(Bi0.5Li0.5)TiO3 (lead-free) are found to be best materials for energy storage applications.",

author = "Gaurav Vats and Rahul Vaish and Bowen, {Chris R.}",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1111/ijac.12168",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "E1--E7",

journal = "International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology",

issn = "1546-542X",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection of ferroelectric ceramics for transducers and electrical energy storage devices

AU - Vats, Gaurav

AU - Vaish, Rahul

AU - Bowen, Chris R.

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - The selection of an optimal ferroelectric material according to the user requirements is a crucial as well as onerous task; examples of such requirements include high efficiency, sensitivity, wide operating temperature, and frequency range, compact size, low cost and low loss, etc. In this study, quality function deployment (QFD) in combination with multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) is employed for material selection. Pb(1-x)Lax)(ZryTi) (1-y))O3[PLZT (7/60/40)] (lead-based) and (K 0.44Na0.52Li0.04)-(Nb 0.84Ta0.1Sb0.06)O3(KNN-LT-LS) (lead-free) are found to be the top-ranked piezoelectric ceramics for transducer applications. PLZT (7/60/40) (lead-based) and 0.7Bi0.5Na0.5TiO-3-0.2Bi0.5K0.5TiO3-0.1(Bi0.5Li0.5)TiO3 (lead-free) are found to be best materials for energy storage applications.

AB - The selection of an optimal ferroelectric material according to the user requirements is a crucial as well as onerous task; examples of such requirements include high efficiency, sensitivity, wide operating temperature, and frequency range, compact size, low cost and low loss, etc. In this study, quality function deployment (QFD) in combination with multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) is employed for material selection. Pb(1-x)Lax)(ZryTi) (1-y))O3[PLZT (7/60/40)] (lead-based) and (K 0.44Na0.52Li0.04)-(Nb 0.84Ta0.1Sb0.06)O3(KNN-LT-LS) (lead-free) are found to be the top-ranked piezoelectric ceramics for transducer applications. PLZT (7/60/40) (lead-based) and 0.7Bi0.5Na0.5TiO-3-0.2Bi0.5K0.5TiO3-0.1(Bi0.5Li0.5)TiO3 (lead-free) are found to be best materials for energy storage applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883300445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12168

U2 - 10.1111/ijac.12168

DO - 10.1111/ijac.12168

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - E1-E7

JO - International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology

JF - International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology

SN - 1546-542X

IS - S1

ER -

Selection of ferroelectric ceramics for transducers and electrical energy storage devices

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this