Abstract
Philosophers, theologians and psychologists alike have explored the very nature of evil. Arguably my purpose here is altogether more grounded but nonetheless urgent in asking – is our industry evil due the completely unnecessary negative impact buildings have on people and the planet? Having played with this question, I examine if industry-scale change might be brought about if we lipped the issue of designing less harmful buildings from a technical one to an aesthetic one. I suggest this might be possible by viewing buildings differently, by considering them from a moral rather than a purely architectural perspective.
Working on the assumption that harmful elements of buildings might be seen as morally unacceptable, I then ask if they might be considered, ugly, rather than just inefficient? In short, I want to foster a link between aesthetic, ecological and moral values. Finally, I ponder whether a new way of reading buildings might be possible, by associating certain visual clues with harm and ugliness and thereby back to the concept of evil.
Working on the assumption that harmful elements of buildings might be seen as morally unacceptable, I then ask if they might be considered, ugly, rather than just inefficient? In short, I want to foster a link between aesthetic, ecological and moral values. Finally, I ponder whether a new way of reading buildings might be possible, by associating certain visual clues with harm and ugliness and thereby back to the concept of evil.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Type | Essay |
| Media of output | |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'See No Evil'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS