Scaling Up? Unpacking the Effect of Deliberative Mini-Publics on Legitimacy Perceptions

Micha Germann, Sofie Marien, Lala Muradova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Deliberative mini-publics are increasingly used to try to tackle public discontent with the functioning of democracy. However, the ability of mini-publics to increase perceptions of legitimate decision-making among citizens at large remains unclear, given especially that existing studies have not considered the potentially damaging effects of mini-public recommendations not being followed. We designed, pre-registered, and ran a survey experiment in Ireland to test the effects of mini-publics on legitimacy perceptions conditional on whether or not their non-binding policy recommendations are honored (N= 1,309). We find that mini-publics increase legitimacy perceptions among the broader citizenry; however, these beneficial effects are largely limited to situations in which their recommendations are honored. Additional results suggest that it makes no difference whether mini-public recommendations are overturned by elected representatives or by citizens in a referendum. Finally, we find that the legitimacy-enhancing effects of participatory processes are driven by citizens with low political trust.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Studies
DOIs
Publication statusAcceptance date - 20 Oct 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scaling Up? Unpacking the Effect of Deliberative Mini-Publics on Legitimacy Perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this