Abstract
Models for gamma-ray burst afterglow dynamics and synchrotron spectra are known to exhibit various scale invariances, owing to the scale-free nature of fluid dynamics and the power-law shape of synchrotron spectra. Since GRB 170817A, off-axis jet models including a lateral energy structure in the initial outflow geometry have gained in prominence. Here, we demonstrate how the scale invariance for arbitrary jet structure and dynamical stage can be expressed locally as a function of jet temporal light-curve slope. We provide afterglow flux expressions and demonstrate their use to quickly assess the physical implications of observations. We apply the scaling expressions to the Swift X-ray Telescope sample, which shows a spread in observed fluxes, binned by light-curve slope at time of observation, that increases with increasing light-curve slope. According to the scaling relations, this pattern is inconsistent with a large spread in environment densities if these were the dominant factor determining the variability of light curves. We further show how the late deep Newtonian afterglow stage remains scale-invariant but adds distinct spectral scaling regimes. Finally, we show that for given jet structure a universal curve can be constructed of the centroid offset, image size, and ellipticity (that can be measured using very large baseline interferometry) versus observer angle, in a manner independent of explosion energy and circumburst density. Our results apply to any synchrotron transient characterized by a release of energy in an external medium, including supernova remnants, kilonova afterglows, and soft gamma-repeater flares.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 4094-4106 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
Volume | 530 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 27 Apr 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Jun 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
No new data were generated or analysed in support of this research.Funding
The authors thank Nora Troja and Luigi Piro for helpful discussion and HJvE thanks for their hospitality the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics at the Waterloo, Canada, where a large part of this work was completed. Research at Perimeter Institute was supported in part by the Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development and by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Colleges and Universities. HJvE acknowledges support by the European Union Horizon 2020 programme under the AHEAD2020 project (grant agreement number 871158) and by the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) through grant ST/X001067/1.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada | |
Government of Canada | |
Institut Périmètre de physique théorique | |
Ministry of Colleges and Universities | |
Horizon 2020 | 871158 |
Horizon 2020 | |
Science and Technology Facilities Council | ST/X001067/1 |
Science and Technology Facilities Council |
Keywords
- gamma-ray burst: general
- gamma-ray bursts: individual: 170817A
- radiation mechanisms: non-thermal
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Space and Planetary Science