Abstract
Geotechnical centrifuge modelling of vegetated slopes requires appropriately scaled plant roots. Recent studies have independently suggested that juvenile live plants or 3D printing to fabricate root analogues could potentially produce representative prototype model root systems. This paper presents a critical comparison of juvenile versus 3D printed approaches in terms of their representation of root mechanical properties, root morphology and distribution of the additional shear strength generated by the roots with depth. For the 3D printing technique, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) plastic material was used, while for live plants, three species (Willow, Gorse and Festulolium grass), corresponding to distinct plant group functional types (tree, shrub and grass), were considered. The tensile strength andYoung’s modulus of the ‘roots’were collected from uniaxial tension tests and shear strength data of rooted soil samples was collected in direct shear. The prototype root characteristics as modelled were then compared with published results for field grown species and the benefits and challenges of using these two modelling approaches is discussed. Finally, some recommendations on realistically modelling plant root systems in centrifuge tests are given.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Physical Modelling in Geotechnics |
Editors | Andrew McNamara, Sam Divall, Richard Goodey, Neil Taylor, Sarah Stallebrass, Jignasha Panchal |
Publisher | CRC Press |
Pages | 401-406 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781138559752 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 24 Oct 2018 |
Event | 9th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, ICPMG 2018 - London, UK United Kingdom Duration: 17 Jul 2018 → 20 Jul 2018 |
Publication series
Name | Physical Modelling in Geotechnics |
---|---|
Volume | 1 |
Conference
Conference | 9th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, ICPMG 2018 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | UK United Kingdom |
City | London |
Period | 17/07/18 → 20/07/18 |
Funding
This research was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, EP/M020355/1; a collaboration between the Universities of Dundee, Southampton, Aberdeen, Durham and The James Hutton Institute. The authors thank Professor Mike Humphreys (IBERS, Aberystwyth University) and Scotia seeds for providing seeds used in this study. The James Hutton Institute receives funding from the Scottish Government (Rural & Environmental Services & Analytical Services Division).
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology