Saving with group or individual personal pension schemes: How much difference does it make?

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

It is commonly argued that seeking the advice and services of wealth mangers is financially beneficial. However, the literature also suggests that wealth managers are skilled in favoring financially savvy investors by offering them lower fees. This paper looks beyond the fee differentiation issue and addresses the question of whether wealth managers engage in another form of investor discrimination by offering similar individual investors different quality investment opportunities according to whether, or not, an ‘informed’ third party is negotiating on the investor’s behalf. Using a sample of 14,429 individual personal pension funds (IPPs) and 1,681 group personal pension funds (GPPs) offered to UK investors over 1986-2015 (adopting cross-section, time-series and propensity score matching analysis on a range of sub-samples, investment styles and sub-periods) we show that GPPs statistically and economically outperform IPPs. We show that the results hold in the sample of providers offering both GPP and IPP services and, thus, cannot be explained by the market segmentation argument or sample selection bias. We also document that GPPs tend to have tougher performance benchmarks and, surprisingly, that tougher performance benchmarks are associated with better benchmark-related performance.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-81
Number of pages81
StatusUnpublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Pension scheme
Investors
Wealth
Benchmark
Fees
Managers
Pension funds
Propensity score matching
Discrimination
Negotiating
Investment opportunities
Cross section
Sample selection bias
Individual investors
Market segmentation
Investment style

Keywords

  • pension funds
  • performance
  • benchmarks
  • individual investors

Cite this

@techreport{2014b8ae608d4edfaa96a18a177dc858,
title = "Saving with group or individual personal pension schemes: How much difference does it make?",
abstract = "It is commonly argued that seeking the advice and services of wealth mangers is financially beneficial. However, the literature also suggests that wealth managers are skilled in favoring financially savvy investors by offering them lower fees. This paper looks beyond the fee differentiation issue and addresses the question of whether wealth managers engage in another form of investor discrimination by offering similar individual investors different quality investment opportunities according to whether, or not, an ‘informed’ third party is negotiating on the investor’s behalf. Using a sample of 14,429 individual personal pension funds (IPPs) and 1,681 group personal pension funds (GPPs) offered to UK investors over 1986-2015 (adopting cross-section, time-series and propensity score matching analysis on a range of sub-samples, investment styles and sub-periods) we show that GPPs statistically and economically outperform IPPs. We show that the results hold in the sample of providers offering both GPP and IPP services and, thus, cannot be explained by the market segmentation argument or sample selection bias. We also document that GPPs tend to have tougher performance benchmarks and, surprisingly, that tougher performance benchmarks are associated with better benchmark-related performance.",
keywords = "pension funds, performance, benchmarks, individual investors",
author = "Anna Zalewska",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
language = "English",
pages = "1--81",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Saving with group or individual personal pension schemes: How much difference does it make?

AU - Zalewska, Anna

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - It is commonly argued that seeking the advice and services of wealth mangers is financially beneficial. However, the literature also suggests that wealth managers are skilled in favoring financially savvy investors by offering them lower fees. This paper looks beyond the fee differentiation issue and addresses the question of whether wealth managers engage in another form of investor discrimination by offering similar individual investors different quality investment opportunities according to whether, or not, an ‘informed’ third party is negotiating on the investor’s behalf. Using a sample of 14,429 individual personal pension funds (IPPs) and 1,681 group personal pension funds (GPPs) offered to UK investors over 1986-2015 (adopting cross-section, time-series and propensity score matching analysis on a range of sub-samples, investment styles and sub-periods) we show that GPPs statistically and economically outperform IPPs. We show that the results hold in the sample of providers offering both GPP and IPP services and, thus, cannot be explained by the market segmentation argument or sample selection bias. We also document that GPPs tend to have tougher performance benchmarks and, surprisingly, that tougher performance benchmarks are associated with better benchmark-related performance.

AB - It is commonly argued that seeking the advice and services of wealth mangers is financially beneficial. However, the literature also suggests that wealth managers are skilled in favoring financially savvy investors by offering them lower fees. This paper looks beyond the fee differentiation issue and addresses the question of whether wealth managers engage in another form of investor discrimination by offering similar individual investors different quality investment opportunities according to whether, or not, an ‘informed’ third party is negotiating on the investor’s behalf. Using a sample of 14,429 individual personal pension funds (IPPs) and 1,681 group personal pension funds (GPPs) offered to UK investors over 1986-2015 (adopting cross-section, time-series and propensity score matching analysis on a range of sub-samples, investment styles and sub-periods) we show that GPPs statistically and economically outperform IPPs. We show that the results hold in the sample of providers offering both GPP and IPP services and, thus, cannot be explained by the market segmentation argument or sample selection bias. We also document that GPPs tend to have tougher performance benchmarks and, surprisingly, that tougher performance benchmarks are associated with better benchmark-related performance.

KW - pension funds

KW - performance

KW - benchmarks

KW - individual investors

UR - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2920818

M3 - Working paper

SP - 1

EP - 81

BT - Saving with group or individual personal pension schemes: How much difference does it make?

ER -