Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power

Research output: Working paper

57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, reconciliation and the building of a unified nation have become key challenges for the new Rwandan political elite. To this end, over almost two decades, the government has introduced a variety of supposedly ‘traditional,’ ‘local’ and ‘participatory’ activities ranging from the well-studied gacaca courts (‘justice on the grass’) (see e.g., Clark 2010, Ingelaere 2009, Rettig 2008, Oomen 2006) to very little known activities such as ingando camps, itorero schools, ubudehe ‘mutual assistance’ schemes, ubusabane ‘get-together’ festivals, abakangurambaga or local ‘promoters,’ among many others. The present paper could have focused on a number of the recently-introduced ‘unity and reconciliation’ activities since all but gacaca have received almost no scholarly attention. Ingando camps, however, should interest us for many reasons, many of which will become apparent throughout the analysis below. Just as with the other activities, ingando offers insights into the performative aspect of nation-building—the ways in which a nation/unity is being ‘enacted,’ what type(s) of ‘unities’ are thus actually being built in Rwanda and how they are being built (official versions versus those that arise from enaction), and what other (non-stated) objectives might be served in the name of ‘nation-building.’ But unlike other activities, the camps provide a unique insight into the way in which spatial and symbolic aspects, especially ‘liminality’ (a camp as a transient and transitional space), are being used to reproduce power (a structural set of relations).
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherRefugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford
Number of pages49
Volume80
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Publication series

NameOxford Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series
PublisherOxford Refugee Studies Centre
No.80

Fingerprint

Rwanda
state formation
reconciliation
genocide
political elite
festival
assistance
justice
school

Cite this

Purdekova, A. (2011). Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power. (Oxford Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series; No. 80). Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford.

Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power. / Purdekova, Andrea.

Oxford : Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford, 2011. (Oxford Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series; No. 80).

Research output: Working paper

Purdekova, A 2011 'Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power' Oxford Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series, no. 80, Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Purdekova A. Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power. Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford. 2011. (Oxford Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series; 80).
Purdekova, Andrea. / Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power. Oxford : Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford, 2011. (Oxford Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series; 80).
@techreport{980e73ccda174733bedfd9e566c6d17f,
title = "Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power",
abstract = "In the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, reconciliation and the building of a unified nation have become key challenges for the new Rwandan political elite. To this end, over almost two decades, the government has introduced a variety of supposedly ‘traditional,’ ‘local’ and ‘participatory’ activities ranging from the well-studied gacaca courts (‘justice on the grass’) (see e.g., Clark 2010, Ingelaere 2009, Rettig 2008, Oomen 2006) to very little known activities such as ingando camps, itorero schools, ubudehe ‘mutual assistance’ schemes, ubusabane ‘get-together’ festivals, abakangurambaga or local ‘promoters,’ among many others. The present paper could have focused on a number of the recently-introduced ‘unity and reconciliation’ activities since all but gacaca have received almost no scholarly attention. Ingando camps, however, should interest us for many reasons, many of which will become apparent throughout the analysis below. Just as with the other activities, ingando offers insights into the performative aspect of nation-building—the ways in which a nation/unity is being ‘enacted,’ what type(s) of ‘unities’ are thus actually being built in Rwanda and how they are being built (official versions versus those that arise from enaction), and what other (non-stated) objectives might be served in the name of ‘nation-building.’ But unlike other activities, the camps provide a unique insight into the way in which spatial and symbolic aspects, especially ‘liminality’ (a camp as a transient and transitional space), are being used to reproduce power (a structural set of relations).",
author = "Andrea Purdekova",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
series = "Oxford Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford",
number = "80",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power

AU - Purdekova, Andrea

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, reconciliation and the building of a unified nation have become key challenges for the new Rwandan political elite. To this end, over almost two decades, the government has introduced a variety of supposedly ‘traditional,’ ‘local’ and ‘participatory’ activities ranging from the well-studied gacaca courts (‘justice on the grass’) (see e.g., Clark 2010, Ingelaere 2009, Rettig 2008, Oomen 2006) to very little known activities such as ingando camps, itorero schools, ubudehe ‘mutual assistance’ schemes, ubusabane ‘get-together’ festivals, abakangurambaga or local ‘promoters,’ among many others. The present paper could have focused on a number of the recently-introduced ‘unity and reconciliation’ activities since all but gacaca have received almost no scholarly attention. Ingando camps, however, should interest us for many reasons, many of which will become apparent throughout the analysis below. Just as with the other activities, ingando offers insights into the performative aspect of nation-building—the ways in which a nation/unity is being ‘enacted,’ what type(s) of ‘unities’ are thus actually being built in Rwanda and how they are being built (official versions versus those that arise from enaction), and what other (non-stated) objectives might be served in the name of ‘nation-building.’ But unlike other activities, the camps provide a unique insight into the way in which spatial and symbolic aspects, especially ‘liminality’ (a camp as a transient and transitional space), are being used to reproduce power (a structural set of relations).

AB - In the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, reconciliation and the building of a unified nation have become key challenges for the new Rwandan political elite. To this end, over almost two decades, the government has introduced a variety of supposedly ‘traditional,’ ‘local’ and ‘participatory’ activities ranging from the well-studied gacaca courts (‘justice on the grass’) (see e.g., Clark 2010, Ingelaere 2009, Rettig 2008, Oomen 2006) to very little known activities such as ingando camps, itorero schools, ubudehe ‘mutual assistance’ schemes, ubusabane ‘get-together’ festivals, abakangurambaga or local ‘promoters,’ among many others. The present paper could have focused on a number of the recently-introduced ‘unity and reconciliation’ activities since all but gacaca have received almost no scholarly attention. Ingando camps, however, should interest us for many reasons, many of which will become apparent throughout the analysis below. Just as with the other activities, ingando offers insights into the performative aspect of nation-building—the ways in which a nation/unity is being ‘enacted,’ what type(s) of ‘unities’ are thus actually being built in Rwanda and how they are being built (official versions versus those that arise from enaction), and what other (non-stated) objectives might be served in the name of ‘nation-building.’ But unlike other activities, the camps provide a unique insight into the way in which spatial and symbolic aspects, especially ‘liminality’ (a camp as a transient and transitional space), are being used to reproduce power (a structural set of relations).

M3 - Working paper

VL - 80

T3 - Oxford Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper Series

BT - Rwanda’s Ingando Camps: Liminality and the Reproduction of Power

PB - Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford

CY - Oxford

ER -