Russia’s Ministry of Ambivalence

The Failure of Civic Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Russia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article argues that the sources of official and societal ambivalence towards civic nationhood in today’s Russia are found in the institutional instability and personalist dynamics of hybrid regime politics in the 1990s. Successful civic nation-building should institutionalize inclusive criteria for citizenship as a basis for policymaking, which in turn should create incentives for dominant ethnicities to embrace civic nationhood. While the shifting views of Boris Yel’tsin on nationalities policy and the constant turmoil in the government’s nationalities ministry have received little scholarly attention, they illuminate the endogenous sources of regime instability in relation to civic nation-building. Russia’s experience thus challenges the traditional view of ethnic nationalism as fostering authoritarianism and civic nationalism as fostering democracy: rather, competitive authoritarianism in the 1990s confounded the regime’s own efforts toward civic nation-building and laid the groundwork for the “ethnic turn” in Russian politics under Vladimir Putin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-160
Number of pages21
JournalPost-Soviet Affairs
Volume35
Issue number2
Early online date21 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

state formation
ambivalence
nationality
ministry
Russia
regime
institutionalization
opposition
elite
Ambivalence
Nationality
citizen
examination
politics
Government

Keywords

  • hybrid regimes
  • nation-building
  • nationalism
  • institutions
  • Russia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Russia’s Ministry of Ambivalence : The Failure of Civic Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Russia . / Goode, James.

In: Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 2, 05.02.2019, p. 140-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{775ab51d939a4f4aaec222cfcc8e68c0,
title = "Russia’s Ministry of Ambivalence: The Failure of Civic Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Russia",
abstract = "This article argues that the sources of official and societal ambivalence towards civic nationhood in today’s Russia are found in the institutional instability and personalist dynamics of hybrid regime politics in the 1990s. Successful civic nation-building should institutionalize inclusive criteria for citizenship as a basis for policymaking, which in turn should create incentives for dominant ethnicities to embrace civic nationhood. While the shifting views of Boris Yel’tsin on nationalities policy and the constant turmoil in the government’s nationalities ministry have received little scholarly attention, they illuminate the endogenous sources of regime instability in relation to civic nation-building. Russia’s experience thus challenges the traditional view of ethnic nationalism as fostering authoritarianism and civic nationalism as fostering democracy: rather, competitive authoritarianism in the 1990s confounded the regime’s own efforts toward civic nation-building and laid the groundwork for the “ethnic turn” in Russian politics under Vladimir Putin.",
keywords = "hybrid regimes, nation-building, nationalism, institutions, Russia",
author = "James Goode",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/1060586X.2018.1547040",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "140--160",
journal = "Post-Soviet Affairs",
issn = "1060-586X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Russia’s Ministry of Ambivalence

T2 - The Failure of Civic Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Russia

AU - Goode, James

PY - 2019/2/5

Y1 - 2019/2/5

N2 - This article argues that the sources of official and societal ambivalence towards civic nationhood in today’s Russia are found in the institutional instability and personalist dynamics of hybrid regime politics in the 1990s. Successful civic nation-building should institutionalize inclusive criteria for citizenship as a basis for policymaking, which in turn should create incentives for dominant ethnicities to embrace civic nationhood. While the shifting views of Boris Yel’tsin on nationalities policy and the constant turmoil in the government’s nationalities ministry have received little scholarly attention, they illuminate the endogenous sources of regime instability in relation to civic nation-building. Russia’s experience thus challenges the traditional view of ethnic nationalism as fostering authoritarianism and civic nationalism as fostering democracy: rather, competitive authoritarianism in the 1990s confounded the regime’s own efforts toward civic nation-building and laid the groundwork for the “ethnic turn” in Russian politics under Vladimir Putin.

AB - This article argues that the sources of official and societal ambivalence towards civic nationhood in today’s Russia are found in the institutional instability and personalist dynamics of hybrid regime politics in the 1990s. Successful civic nation-building should institutionalize inclusive criteria for citizenship as a basis for policymaking, which in turn should create incentives for dominant ethnicities to embrace civic nationhood. While the shifting views of Boris Yel’tsin on nationalities policy and the constant turmoil in the government’s nationalities ministry have received little scholarly attention, they illuminate the endogenous sources of regime instability in relation to civic nation-building. Russia’s experience thus challenges the traditional view of ethnic nationalism as fostering authoritarianism and civic nationalism as fostering democracy: rather, competitive authoritarianism in the 1990s confounded the regime’s own efforts toward civic nation-building and laid the groundwork for the “ethnic turn” in Russian politics under Vladimir Putin.

KW - hybrid regimes

KW - nation-building

KW - nationalism

KW - institutions

KW - Russia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059006743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1060586X.2018.1547040

DO - 10.1080/1060586X.2018.1547040

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 140

EP - 160

JO - Post-Soviet Affairs

JF - Post-Soviet Affairs

SN - 1060-586X

IS - 2

ER -