Risk, science and policy: definitional struggles, information management, the media and BSE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 78 Citations

Abstract

This article examines the role of definitional struggles in the science–policy interface using the example of the cattle disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or mad cow disease in the UK. A central contention is that an explicit focus on definition illuminates the processes by which scientific judgements are made, promoted, communicated, assessed and judged and gives an improved picture of policy making. Neglected areas such as the role of secrecy, public relations and the mass media in the science–policy interface are brought into sharper focus as an intrinsic part of the wider operation of definitional struggles. The focus on definitional struggles also sheds light on some current work on risk in social theory. It is argued that the neglect of questions of agency which are central to definitional struggles has led to some theorists presenting risks as inevitable concomitants of technological and cultural developments leaving them in the grip of political quietism.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1239-1255
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume49
Issue number9
DOIs
StatusPublished - Nov 1999

Fingerprint

Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
Information Management
science policy
information management
Public Relations
Cattle Diseases
Disease
Mass Media
cultural development
Policy Making
Confidentiality
secrecy
Hand Strength
technical development
science
mass media
neglect
Science Policy
Social Theory
Secrecy

Cite this

Risk, science and policy: definitional struggles, information management, the media and BSE. / Miller, David.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 9, 11.1999, p. 1239-1255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0408b8a20a95421cb0c62b99ac97690b,
title = "Risk, science and policy: definitional struggles, information management, the media and BSE",
abstract = "This article examines the role of definitional struggles in the science–policy interface using the example of the cattle disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or mad cow disease in the UK. A central contention is that an explicit focus on definition illuminates the processes by which scientific judgements are made, promoted, communicated, assessed and judged and gives an improved picture of policy making. Neglected areas such as the role of secrecy, public relations and the mass media in the science–policy interface are brought into sharper focus as an intrinsic part of the wider operation of definitional struggles. The focus on definitional struggles also sheds light on some current work on risk in social theory. It is argued that the neglect of questions of agency which are central to definitional struggles has led to some theorists presenting risks as inevitable concomitants of technological and cultural developments leaving them in the grip of political quietism.",
author = "David Miller",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00163-X",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1239--1255",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk, science and policy: definitional struggles, information management, the media and BSE

AU - Miller,David

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - This article examines the role of definitional struggles in the science–policy interface using the example of the cattle disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or mad cow disease in the UK. A central contention is that an explicit focus on definition illuminates the processes by which scientific judgements are made, promoted, communicated, assessed and judged and gives an improved picture of policy making. Neglected areas such as the role of secrecy, public relations and the mass media in the science–policy interface are brought into sharper focus as an intrinsic part of the wider operation of definitional struggles. The focus on definitional struggles also sheds light on some current work on risk in social theory. It is argued that the neglect of questions of agency which are central to definitional struggles has led to some theorists presenting risks as inevitable concomitants of technological and cultural developments leaving them in the grip of political quietism.

AB - This article examines the role of definitional struggles in the science–policy interface using the example of the cattle disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or mad cow disease in the UK. A central contention is that an explicit focus on definition illuminates the processes by which scientific judgements are made, promoted, communicated, assessed and judged and gives an improved picture of policy making. Neglected areas such as the role of secrecy, public relations and the mass media in the science–policy interface are brought into sharper focus as an intrinsic part of the wider operation of definitional struggles. The focus on definitional struggles also sheds light on some current work on risk in social theory. It is argued that the neglect of questions of agency which are central to definitional struggles has led to some theorists presenting risks as inevitable concomitants of technological and cultural developments leaving them in the grip of political quietism.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00163-X

U2 - 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00163-X

DO - 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00163-X

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1239

EP - 1255

JO - Social Science and Medicine

T2 - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 9

ER -