Risk of bicycle collisions and 'safety in numbers': A natural experiment using the local introduction of e-scooters in England

Hannah B. Edwards, Frank De Vocht, Russell Jago, Miranda Elaine Glynis Armstrong, Edward Carlton, Yoav Ben-Shlomo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: Ecological studies hypothesise a 'safety in numbers' (SiN) effect whereby road safety for bicycles and other micromobility users improves as their numbers increase, due to behavioural changes of motorists. Causal interpretation of these studies is difficult due to confounding and reverse causation. The introduction of electric scooter (e-scooter) rental schemes in selected districts in England meant an increase in micromobility users in these areas, which presented an opportunity to test the SiN hypothesis using a natural experiment. Methods: Time-series analysis of police data on road collisions in local authorities (LAs) in Great Britain, 2015-2023. Random-effects Poisson regression time-series models compared collision rates in LA districts with an e-scooter trial (n=41) versus matched control districts (n=41). Primary outcomes were all road collisions and bicycle collisions. Models adjusted for time; seasonality; baseline collision rate; COVID-19 period; and preintervention/postintervention period (proxied by intervention group/COVID-19 period interaction). Results: The rate of bicycle collisions reduced following the introduction of the schemes, compared with control districts (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89 during peak COVID-19; IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99 in the post-COVID-19 period). This effect was specific to bicycle collisions and strongest in the subgroup of serious/fatal collisions. Conclusions: Findings suggest that the increase of a new and sustainable mode of transport, e-scooters, may have reduced bicycle collisions. This could have far-reaching benefits including reduced injuries, safer environments, and public health and environmental benefits if more people choose bicycles and micromobility over car transport. Findings should be verified in further work.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberip-2024-045569
Number of pages6
JournalInjury Prevention
Early online date20 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. All data used in this study is publicly accessible.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Matthew Tranter, Head of Road
Safety Statistics for the Department for Transport, for sharing his expertise on these
datasets, and the cyclists who have been involved with the work so far.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West, core NIHR infrastructure funded: NIHR200181). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

FundersFunder number
National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West
National Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR200181

    Keywords

    • Bicycle
    • Epidemiology
    • Non-randomized Trial
    • Policy
    • Public Health
    • Time series

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Risk of bicycle collisions and 'safety in numbers': A natural experiment using the local introduction of e-scooters in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this