Risk communication

factors affecting impact

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The impact of risk communication depends upon a complex interaction between the characteristics of the audience, the source of the message, and its content. Audience perception of risk is influenced by demographic factors (e.g. age, gender), personality profile, past experience, and ideological orientation. It is also affected by cognitive biases (e.g. unrealistic optimism) and lay 'mental models' of the hazard. For food hazards, the important dimensions of risk are controllability, novelty and naturalness. The source must be trusted for a risk message to be effective. Trust is associated with believing the source is expert, unbiased, disinterested, and not sensationalising. To maximise impact, risk communications must have a content which triggers attention, achieves comprehension and can influence decision-making. It must be unambiguous, definitive and easily interpretable - rarely achievable particularly when risk is shrouded in scientific uncertainty. Risk messages initiate social processes of amplification and attenuation, consequently their ramifications are rarely controllable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-120
JournalBritish Medical Bulletin
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Communication
Proportional Hazards Models
Uncertainty
Personality
Decision Making
Demography
Food

Cite this

Risk communication : factors affecting impact. / Breakwell, G. W.

In: British Medical Bulletin, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2000, p. 110-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c41083b02f3405eb0404a0d80cfd2f0,
title = "Risk communication: factors affecting impact",
abstract = "The impact of risk communication depends upon a complex interaction between the characteristics of the audience, the source of the message, and its content. Audience perception of risk is influenced by demographic factors (e.g. age, gender), personality profile, past experience, and ideological orientation. It is also affected by cognitive biases (e.g. unrealistic optimism) and lay 'mental models' of the hazard. For food hazards, the important dimensions of risk are controllability, novelty and naturalness. The source must be trusted for a risk message to be effective. Trust is associated with believing the source is expert, unbiased, disinterested, and not sensationalising. To maximise impact, risk communications must have a content which triggers attention, achieves comprehension and can influence decision-making. It must be unambiguous, definitive and easily interpretable - rarely achievable particularly when risk is shrouded in scientific uncertainty. Risk messages initiate social processes of amplification and attenuation, consequently their ramifications are rarely controllable.",
author = "Breakwell, {G. W.}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1258/0007142001902824",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "110--120",
journal = "British Medical Bulletin",
issn = "0007-1420",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk communication

T2 - factors affecting impact

AU - Breakwell, G. W.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The impact of risk communication depends upon a complex interaction between the characteristics of the audience, the source of the message, and its content. Audience perception of risk is influenced by demographic factors (e.g. age, gender), personality profile, past experience, and ideological orientation. It is also affected by cognitive biases (e.g. unrealistic optimism) and lay 'mental models' of the hazard. For food hazards, the important dimensions of risk are controllability, novelty and naturalness. The source must be trusted for a risk message to be effective. Trust is associated with believing the source is expert, unbiased, disinterested, and not sensationalising. To maximise impact, risk communications must have a content which triggers attention, achieves comprehension and can influence decision-making. It must be unambiguous, definitive and easily interpretable - rarely achievable particularly when risk is shrouded in scientific uncertainty. Risk messages initiate social processes of amplification and attenuation, consequently their ramifications are rarely controllable.

AB - The impact of risk communication depends upon a complex interaction between the characteristics of the audience, the source of the message, and its content. Audience perception of risk is influenced by demographic factors (e.g. age, gender), personality profile, past experience, and ideological orientation. It is also affected by cognitive biases (e.g. unrealistic optimism) and lay 'mental models' of the hazard. For food hazards, the important dimensions of risk are controllability, novelty and naturalness. The source must be trusted for a risk message to be effective. Trust is associated with believing the source is expert, unbiased, disinterested, and not sensationalising. To maximise impact, risk communications must have a content which triggers attention, achieves comprehension and can influence decision-making. It must be unambiguous, definitive and easily interpretable - rarely achievable particularly when risk is shrouded in scientific uncertainty. Risk messages initiate social processes of amplification and attenuation, consequently their ramifications are rarely controllable.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/0007142001902824

U2 - 10.1258/0007142001902824

DO - 10.1258/0007142001902824

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 110

EP - 120

JO - British Medical Bulletin

JF - British Medical Bulletin

SN - 0007-1420

IS - 1

ER -