Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reviewing ecosystems of evidence: synthesising the evidence on the commercial determinants of health from a complex systems perspective

Alice Tompson, James Thomas, Harry Rutter, Laurence Blanchard, Éadaoin Cott, Rebecca E. Glover, Cecile Knai, Nason Maani, May C. I. van Schalkwyk, Vivian Welch, Mark Petticrew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Commercial Determinants of Health (CDoH) are the systems, practices, and pathways through which commercial actors drive health and equity. This includes their influence on systems of evidence production and dissemination (evidence ecosystems) in order to protect and promote commercial interests. In the Commercial Determinants of Health and Evidence Synthesis (CODES) methodological guidance, we provided advice for conducing CDoH relevant evidence syntheses, from developing a protocol to reporting the review and planning an update. This follow-up paper considers reasons and practical implications for integrating a complex systems perspective in such reviews. This commentary describes how a complex systems perspective can benefit research, including evidence synthesis related to the CDoH, by embracing the complexity of the real world, understanding interventions in context, rendering visible the corporate playbook, and exposing the power dynamics that drive inequity. We then reflect on the practical implications of adopting a complex systems approach in CDoH evidence synthesis, including drawing on a systems lens and/or incorporating specific systems methods in the review. This commentary complements existing CODES guidance in highlighting considerations for conducting CDoH relevant evidence synthesis from a complex systems perspective. It can help interpreting such reviews and raise awareness of how commercial actors can shape evidence ecosystems, particularly evidence synthesis. Having a robust evidence base that considers systems elements and dynamics will support effective action to address the CDoH, improve public health and reduce inequity at scale.
Original languageEnglish
Article number170
Number of pages16
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2026

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Funding

MP, was a co-investigator, CK was a collaborator and AT, MvS, RG, and NM received funding from the SPECTRUM consortium which was funded by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP), a consortium of UK funders [UKRI Research Councils: Medical Research Council (MRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC); Charities: British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Wellcome and The Health Foundation; Government: Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office, Health and Care Research Wales, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and Public Health Agency (NI)]. EC’s PhD funding is provided by the University of Bath. CK was principal investigator, MP and HR co-investigators, and LB received funding from an evidence synthesis on policies to improve the food environment, funded by Public Health Research programme (England), grant number PHR NIHR128607.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reviewing ecosystems of evidence: synthesising the evidence on the commercial determinants of health from a complex systems perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this