Retrospective catalogue conversion: a national study and a discussion based on selected literature

Ann Chapman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Retrospective conversion of catalogues is currently being undertaken by increasing numbers of libraries. In the UK, the Follett Implementation Group on information Technology (FIGIT) recently commissioned a study to assess the justification for a national programme in the higher education sector. An outline of the study and the main recommendations of the report submitted to FIGIT are given. A Literature survey which was part of the study has been expanded to a discussion of aspects of the subject and the information available in the literature. The discussion looks first at the literature in general and notes a lack of material on the situation in particular countries, including the UK. Local, national and international aspects are considered and the benefits summarised. The usefulness of quoted costs of completed or in hand projects is compared with a cost model for estimating costs in advance, and priorities for the allocation of funds are examined. While only printed materials were considered in the study, the need for retroconversion to be extended to non book materials is noted. There are also wider implications for record standards and their applications and the ''ownership'' of records from the extended access to records and collections.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-24
Number of pages9
JournalLibri
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

costs
access to records
information technology
available information
Group
lack
literature
education

Cite this

Retrospective catalogue conversion: a national study and a discussion based on selected literature. / Chapman, Ann.

In: Libri, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1996, p. 16-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{af37c76f008141b1898f5428ad856185,
title = "Retrospective catalogue conversion: a national study and a discussion based on selected literature",
abstract = "Retrospective conversion of catalogues is currently being undertaken by increasing numbers of libraries. In the UK, the Follett Implementation Group on information Technology (FIGIT) recently commissioned a study to assess the justification for a national programme in the higher education sector. An outline of the study and the main recommendations of the report submitted to FIGIT are given. A Literature survey which was part of the study has been expanded to a discussion of aspects of the subject and the information available in the literature. The discussion looks first at the literature in general and notes a lack of material on the situation in particular countries, including the UK. Local, national and international aspects are considered and the benefits summarised. The usefulness of quoted costs of completed or in hand projects is compared with a cost model for estimating costs in advance, and priorities for the allocation of funds are examined. While only printed materials were considered in the study, the need for retroconversion to be extended to non book materials is noted. There are also wider implications for record standards and their applications and the ''ownership'' of records from the extended access to records and collections.",
author = "Ann Chapman",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1515/libr.1996.46.1.16",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "16--24",
journal = "Libri",
issn = "0024-2667",
publisher = "K.G. Saur Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrospective catalogue conversion: a national study and a discussion based on selected literature

AU - Chapman, Ann

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Retrospective conversion of catalogues is currently being undertaken by increasing numbers of libraries. In the UK, the Follett Implementation Group on information Technology (FIGIT) recently commissioned a study to assess the justification for a national programme in the higher education sector. An outline of the study and the main recommendations of the report submitted to FIGIT are given. A Literature survey which was part of the study has been expanded to a discussion of aspects of the subject and the information available in the literature. The discussion looks first at the literature in general and notes a lack of material on the situation in particular countries, including the UK. Local, national and international aspects are considered and the benefits summarised. The usefulness of quoted costs of completed or in hand projects is compared with a cost model for estimating costs in advance, and priorities for the allocation of funds are examined. While only printed materials were considered in the study, the need for retroconversion to be extended to non book materials is noted. There are also wider implications for record standards and their applications and the ''ownership'' of records from the extended access to records and collections.

AB - Retrospective conversion of catalogues is currently being undertaken by increasing numbers of libraries. In the UK, the Follett Implementation Group on information Technology (FIGIT) recently commissioned a study to assess the justification for a national programme in the higher education sector. An outline of the study and the main recommendations of the report submitted to FIGIT are given. A Literature survey which was part of the study has been expanded to a discussion of aspects of the subject and the information available in the literature. The discussion looks first at the literature in general and notes a lack of material on the situation in particular countries, including the UK. Local, national and international aspects are considered and the benefits summarised. The usefulness of quoted costs of completed or in hand projects is compared with a cost model for estimating costs in advance, and priorities for the allocation of funds are examined. While only printed materials were considered in the study, the need for retroconversion to be extended to non book materials is noted. There are also wider implications for record standards and their applications and the ''ownership'' of records from the extended access to records and collections.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/libr.1996.46.1.16

U2 - 10.1515/libr.1996.46.1.16

DO - 10.1515/libr.1996.46.1.16

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 16

EP - 24

JO - Libri

JF - Libri

SN - 0024-2667

IS - 1

ER -