Retrenchment and the New Right: A Comparative Analysis of theImpacts of the Thatcherand Reagan Administrations

Patricia Ruggles; Michael O’Higgins

doi:10.4324/9781003575450-10

Retrenchment and the New Right: A Comparative Analysis of theImpacts of the Thatcherand Reagan Administrations

Patricia Ruggles, Michael O’Higgins

The Urban Institute

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceeding › Book chapter

4 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

The tensions between the demands of the private market and the cost of expanding state obligations for welfare provision were masked in the quarter century after World War II by consistent economic growth in the mixed capitalist societies. Increases in real social expenditure could be financed from the increment in real national income without directly confronting the issues of income redistribution or policy trade-offs in resources allocation, which are inescapable in low growth economies. In this sense, the “welfare state” was indeed the “residual beneficiary of the Growth State.”1.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy
Subtitle of host publication	The Rise and Fall of Policy Regimes
Editors	Martin Rein, Gosta Esping-Andersen, Lee Rainwater
Place of Publication	New York, U. K.
Publisher	Routledge
Chapter	8
Pages	160-190
Number of pages	31
Edition	1st
ISBN (Electronic)	9781040287187, 9781003575450
ISBN (Print)	9780873323901
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003575450-10
Publication status	Published - 31 Dec 1987
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Arts and Humanities
General Social Sciences

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.4324/9781003575450-10

Cite this

Retrenchment and the New Right: A Comparative Analysis of theImpacts of the Thatcherand Reagan Administrations. / Ruggles, Patricia; O’Higgins, Michael.
Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy: The Rise and Fall of Policy Regimes. ed. / Martin Rein; Gosta Esping-Andersen; Lee Rainwater. 1st. ed. New York, U. K.: Routledge, 1987. p. 160-190.

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceeding › Book chapter

@inbook{42295f60b8814875988adf674111ae36,

title = "Retrenchment and the New Right: A Comparative Analysis of theImpacts of the Thatcherand Reagan Administrations",

abstract = "The tensions between the demands of the private market and the cost of expanding state obligations for welfare provision were masked in the quarter century after World War II by consistent economic growth in the mixed capitalist societies. Increases in real social expenditure could be financed from the increment in real national income without directly confronting the issues of income redistribution or policy trade-offs in resources allocation, which are inescapable in low growth economies. In this sense, the “welfare state” was indeed the “residual beneficiary of the Growth State.”1.",

author = "Patricia Ruggles and Michael O{\textquoteright}Higgins",

year = "1987",

month = dec,

day = "31",

doi = "10.4324/9781003575450-10",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780873323901",

pages = "160--190",

editor = "Martin Rein and Gosta Esping-Andersen and Lee Rainwater",

booktitle = "Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy",

publisher = "Routledge",

address = "UK United Kingdom",

edition = "1st",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Retrenchment and the New Right

T2 - A Comparative Analysis of theImpacts of the Thatcherand Reagan Administrations

AU - Ruggles, Patricia

AU - O’Higgins, Michael

PY - 1987/12/31

Y1 - 1987/12/31

N2 - The tensions between the demands of the private market and the cost of expanding state obligations for welfare provision were masked in the quarter century after World War II by consistent economic growth in the mixed capitalist societies. Increases in real social expenditure could be financed from the increment in real national income without directly confronting the issues of income redistribution or policy trade-offs in resources allocation, which are inescapable in low growth economies. In this sense, the “welfare state” was indeed the “residual beneficiary of the Growth State.”1.

AB - The tensions between the demands of the private market and the cost of expanding state obligations for welfare provision were masked in the quarter century after World War II by consistent economic growth in the mixed capitalist societies. Increases in real social expenditure could be financed from the increment in real national income without directly confronting the issues of income redistribution or policy trade-offs in resources allocation, which are inescapable in low growth economies. In this sense, the “welfare state” was indeed the “residual beneficiary of the Growth State.”1.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208907256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781003575450-10

DO - 10.4324/9781003575450-10

M3 - Book chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85208907256

SN - 9780873323901

SP - 160

EP - 190

BT - Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy

A2 - Rein, Martin

A2 - Esping-Andersen, Gosta

A2 - Rainwater, Lee

PB - Routledge

CY - New York, U. K.

ER -

Retrenchment and the New Right: A Comparative Analysis of theImpacts of the Thatcherand Reagan Administrations

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this