Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: Challenging core assumptions

Jennifer  Allan; Anwesha Borthakur; Fiona Kinninburgh; Moritz Petersmann; Angeliki Balayannis; Andrew  Barry; Silke Beck; Keven Elliot; Tim Forsyth; Anita Hardon; Hannah Hughes; Philip Macnaghten; Henrik Selin; Yixian Sun; Alice Vadrot

doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995

Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: Challenging core assumptions

Jennifer Allan, Anwesha Borthakur, Fiona Kinninburgh, Moritz Petersmann, Angeliki Balayannis, Andrew Barry, Silke Beck, Keven Elliot, Tim Forsyth, Anita Hardon, Hannah Hughes, Philip Macnaghten, Henrik Selin, Yixian Sun, Alice Vadrot

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Negotiations are ongoing but fraught for designing a new global science-policy panel for chemicals and waste pollution. In this Perspectives article, we challenge three assumptions guiding these negotiations. First, the new panel should resemble the existing panels of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Second, the creation of a new panel will automatically carry authority within policymaking. Third, the participation of industry is crucial without special consideration for its interests. Further, we identify three steps to enhance the panel's relevance and influence.

Original language	English
Article number	102995
Journal	Global Environmental Change
Volume	92
Early online date	8 Apr 2025
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 8 Apr 2025

Data Availability Statement

The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used.

Keywords

Chemicals
IPBES
IPCC
Science-policy interface
Waste

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Global and Planetary Change
Geography, Planning and Development
Ecology
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995Licence: CC BY

Cite this

Allan, J., Borthakur, A., Kinninburgh, F., Petersmann, M., Balayannis, A., Barry, A., Beck, S., Elliot, K., Forsyth, T., Hardon, A., Hughes, H., Macnaghten, P., Selin, H., Sun, Y., & Vadrot, A. (2025). Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: Challenging core assumptions. Global Environmental Change, 92, Article 102995. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995

Allan, J, Borthakur, A, Kinninburgh, F, Petersmann, M, Balayannis, A, Barry, A, Beck, S, Elliot, K, Forsyth, T, Hardon, A, Hughes, H, Macnaghten, P, Selin, H, Sun, Y & Vadrot, A 2025, 'Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: Challenging core assumptions', Global Environmental Change, vol. 92, 102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995

@article{53e702a322ee4090955894e780d105b4,

title = "Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: Challenging core assumptions",

abstract = "Negotiations are ongoing but fraught for designing a new global science-policy panel for chemicals and waste pollution. In this Perspectives article, we challenge three assumptions guiding these negotiations. First, the new panel should resemble the existing panels of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Second, the creation of a new panel will automatically carry authority within policymaking. Third, the participation of industry is crucial without special consideration for its interests. Further, we identify three steps to enhance the panel's relevance and influence.",

keywords = "Chemicals, IPBES, IPCC, Science-policy interface, Waste",

author = "Jennifer Allan and Anwesha Borthakur and Fiona Kinninburgh and Moritz Petersmann and Angeliki Balayannis and Andrew Barry and Silke Beck and Keven Elliot and Tim Forsyth and Anita Hardon and Hannah Hughes and Philip Macnaghten and Henrik Selin and Yixian Sun and Alice Vadrot",

year = "2025",

month = apr,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995",

language = "English",

volume = "92",

journal = "Global Environmental Change",

issn = "0959-3780",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution

T2 - Challenging core assumptions

AU - Allan, Jennifer

AU - Borthakur, Anwesha

AU - Kinninburgh, Fiona

AU - Petersmann, Moritz

AU - Balayannis, Angeliki

AU - Barry, Andrew

AU - Beck, Silke

AU - Elliot, Keven

AU - Forsyth, Tim

AU - Hardon, Anita

AU - Hughes, Hannah

AU - Macnaghten, Philip

AU - Selin, Henrik

AU - Sun, Yixian

AU - Vadrot, Alice

PY - 2025/4/8

Y1 - 2025/4/8

N2 - Negotiations are ongoing but fraught for designing a new global science-policy panel for chemicals and waste pollution. In this Perspectives article, we challenge three assumptions guiding these negotiations. First, the new panel should resemble the existing panels of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Second, the creation of a new panel will automatically carry authority within policymaking. Third, the participation of industry is crucial without special consideration for its interests. Further, we identify three steps to enhance the panel's relevance and influence.

AB - Negotiations are ongoing but fraught for designing a new global science-policy panel for chemicals and waste pollution. In this Perspectives article, we challenge three assumptions guiding these negotiations. First, the new panel should resemble the existing panels of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Second, the creation of a new panel will automatically carry authority within policymaking. Third, the participation of industry is crucial without special consideration for its interests. Further, we identify three steps to enhance the panel's relevance and influence.

KW - Chemicals

KW - IPBES

KW - IPCC

KW - Science-policy interface

KW - Waste

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001942480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102995

M3 - Article

SN - 0959-3780

VL - 92

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

M1 - 102995

ER -

Rethinking the science-policy interface for chemicals, waste, and pollution: Challenging core assumptions

Abstract

Data Availability Statement

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this