Rethinking the Postwar Period in Spain

Violence and Irregular Civil War, 1939–52

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a consensus among scholars regarding the slow transformation of ‘hot-blooded terror’ into ‘cold-blooded terror’ during the Civil War and the Post-war period in Spain. This article challenges this framework in two ways. First, it argues that the Spanish Civil War did not end in 1939, but lasted until 1952, divided into three stages: asymmetric nonconventional warfare (July 1936 - February 1937), conventional civil war (February 1937 - April 1939), and irregular civil war (April 1939 – 1952). Second, it argues that the narrative of ‘cold-blooded terror’ after 1939 has obscured the complexity of the political violence imposed by the Franco dictatorship. The author argues that throughout the three stages of the Civil War the Francoists implemented a process of political cleansing, but that from April 1939 two different logics of violence were deployed. These depended on the attitude of the vanquished -resignation or resistance- after the defeat of the Republican army. The logic of violence directed against the subjugated enemy was channelled through institutional instruments. In contrast, the logic of counterinsurgency directed against the guerrilla movement, alongside instruments such as military courts and the prison system, imposed a wide repertoire of brutal practices and massacres against civilians and combatants.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Contemporary History
Early online date25 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

post-war period
civil war
Spain
violence
terrorism
Spanish Civil War
guerrilla
resignation
massacre
political violence
dictatorship
warfare
correctional institution
military
Military
narrative
Post-war Period
Irregular
Civil War
Logic

Keywords

  • Irregular War
  • Counterinsurgency
  • Post-war
  • Spain
  • Political Violence
  • Massacre

Cite this

@article{7433b1cf876544eb8691b5b299660be0,
title = "Rethinking the Postwar Period in Spain: Violence and Irregular Civil War, 1939–52",
abstract = "There is a consensus among scholars regarding the slow transformation of ‘hot-blooded terror’ into ‘cold-blooded terror’ during the Civil War and the Post-war period in Spain. This article challenges this framework in two ways. First, it argues that the Spanish Civil War did not end in 1939, but lasted until 1952, divided into three stages: asymmetric nonconventional warfare (July 1936 - February 1937), conventional civil war (February 1937 - April 1939), and irregular civil war (April 1939 – 1952). Second, it argues that the narrative of ‘cold-blooded terror’ after 1939 has obscured the complexity of the political violence imposed by the Franco dictatorship. The author argues that throughout the three stages of the Civil War the Francoists implemented a process of political cleansing, but that from April 1939 two different logics of violence were deployed. These depended on the attitude of the vanquished -resignation or resistance- after the defeat of the Republican army. The logic of violence directed against the subjugated enemy was channelled through institutional instruments. In contrast, the logic of counterinsurgency directed against the guerrilla movement, alongside instruments such as military courts and the prison system, imposed a wide repertoire of brutal practices and massacres against civilians and combatants.",
keywords = "Irregular War, Counterinsurgency, Post-war, Spain, Political Violence, Massacre",
author = "Jorge Marco",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1177/0022009419839764",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary History",
issn = "0022-0094",
publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking the Postwar Period in Spain

T2 - Violence and Irregular Civil War, 1939–52

AU - Marco, Jorge

PY - 2019/6/25

Y1 - 2019/6/25

N2 - There is a consensus among scholars regarding the slow transformation of ‘hot-blooded terror’ into ‘cold-blooded terror’ during the Civil War and the Post-war period in Spain. This article challenges this framework in two ways. First, it argues that the Spanish Civil War did not end in 1939, but lasted until 1952, divided into three stages: asymmetric nonconventional warfare (July 1936 - February 1937), conventional civil war (February 1937 - April 1939), and irregular civil war (April 1939 – 1952). Second, it argues that the narrative of ‘cold-blooded terror’ after 1939 has obscured the complexity of the political violence imposed by the Franco dictatorship. The author argues that throughout the three stages of the Civil War the Francoists implemented a process of political cleansing, but that from April 1939 two different logics of violence were deployed. These depended on the attitude of the vanquished -resignation or resistance- after the defeat of the Republican army. The logic of violence directed against the subjugated enemy was channelled through institutional instruments. In contrast, the logic of counterinsurgency directed against the guerrilla movement, alongside instruments such as military courts and the prison system, imposed a wide repertoire of brutal practices and massacres against civilians and combatants.

AB - There is a consensus among scholars regarding the slow transformation of ‘hot-blooded terror’ into ‘cold-blooded terror’ during the Civil War and the Post-war period in Spain. This article challenges this framework in two ways. First, it argues that the Spanish Civil War did not end in 1939, but lasted until 1952, divided into three stages: asymmetric nonconventional warfare (July 1936 - February 1937), conventional civil war (February 1937 - April 1939), and irregular civil war (April 1939 – 1952). Second, it argues that the narrative of ‘cold-blooded terror’ after 1939 has obscured the complexity of the political violence imposed by the Franco dictatorship. The author argues that throughout the three stages of the Civil War the Francoists implemented a process of political cleansing, but that from April 1939 two different logics of violence were deployed. These depended on the attitude of the vanquished -resignation or resistance- after the defeat of the Republican army. The logic of violence directed against the subjugated enemy was channelled through institutional instruments. In contrast, the logic of counterinsurgency directed against the guerrilla movement, alongside instruments such as military courts and the prison system, imposed a wide repertoire of brutal practices and massacres against civilians and combatants.

KW - Irregular War

KW - Counterinsurgency

KW - Post-war

KW - Spain

KW - Political Violence

KW - Massacre

U2 - 10.1177/0022009419839764

DO - 10.1177/0022009419839764

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Contemporary History

JF - Journal of Contemporary History

SN - 0022-0094

ER -