Abstract
International human resource management (IHRM) has covered two very distinct areas: comparative HRM (comparing HRM between national settings) and HRM in multinational enterprises (MNEs). Existing research has pointed to the multifaceted nature of contextual effects, and how they may differ qualitatively according to locale. This perspective article argues that a distinct and shared theme across this literature is much more than a recognition that many different sets of institutions and/or cultural features can make for viable alternative HRM models. We also consider whether or not MNEs seek to accommodate local realities or work to change them. Developing and broadening inquiry around these concerns may represent a solid way for researching IHRM in an age of polycrisis. Such understandings may be of great value in exploring the relationship between the present global polycrisis and HRM practice. We highlight potential concerns and opportunities for theorizing around the same.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3173-3206 |
Number of pages | 34 |
Journal | International Journal of Human Resource Management |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 19 |
Early online date | 12 Sept 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Dec 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
There is no data involved in this paper.Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number: 71832012.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Natural Science Foundation of China | 71832012 |
Keywords
- Context
- cross-cultural theory
- institutional theory
- international HRM
- polycrisis
- Sustainable Development Goals
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Strategy and Management
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation