Researcher’s guilt: confessions from the darker side of ethnographic consumer research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A reflexive approach to qualitative research seeks to uncover structures of inequality in the research encounter. On the surface, it would seem that ethnographic methods provide the conditions to alleviate this methodological instrumentalism. By employing a confessional account, this paper demonstrates how the paradox of asymmetrical rapport prevents ethnographic work from reaching its collaborative potential. Drawing from insights in an ethnographic enquiry in an arts charity, the author narrates the guilty experiences that arise when researchers reproduce a culture of commodifying informants. This is exemplified through impression management tactics that generate an illusion of mutuality, alternating with more authentic instances of co-participation. The implications of this self-perceived moral violation are discussed for the researched, the researcher and ethnographies of consumption more broadly. The paper contributes to the methodological literature by explaining the potential of confessional accounts as a tool to operationalise reflexive, reciprocal practice, counteracting the demands of a knowledge economy.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-15
Number of pages15
JournalConsumption Markets and Culture
Early online date30 May 2018
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 30 May 2018

Fingerprint

consumer research
Guilt
guilt
Research Personnel
Cultural Anthropology
Charities
knowledge economy
Qualitative Research
Art
Research
tactics
ethnography
qualitative research
art
participation
management
experience
Consumer research
literature
Knowledge economy

Keywords

  • asymmetrical rapport
  • confessional reflexivity
  • ethics
  • Ethnography
  • fieldwork instrumentalism
  • research reciprocity
  • researcher’s guilt

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{a721ef0ad70d45b0b0bf68f6a701c978,
title = "Researcher’s guilt: confessions from the darker side of ethnographic consumer research",
abstract = "A reflexive approach to qualitative research seeks to uncover structures of inequality in the research encounter. On the surface, it would seem that ethnographic methods provide the conditions to alleviate this methodological instrumentalism. By employing a confessional account, this paper demonstrates how the paradox of asymmetrical rapport prevents ethnographic work from reaching its collaborative potential. Drawing from insights in an ethnographic enquiry in an arts charity, the author narrates the guilty experiences that arise when researchers reproduce a culture of commodifying informants. This is exemplified through impression management tactics that generate an illusion of mutuality, alternating with more authentic instances of co-participation. The implications of this self-perceived moral violation are discussed for the researched, the researcher and ethnographies of consumption more broadly. The paper contributes to the methodological literature by explaining the potential of confessional accounts as a tool to operationalise reflexive, reciprocal practice, counteracting the demands of a knowledge economy.",
keywords = "asymmetrical rapport, confessional reflexivity, ethics, Ethnography, fieldwork instrumentalism, research reciprocity, researcher’s guilt",
author = "Elizabeth Mamali",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/10253866.2018.1474109",
language = "English",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Consumption, Markets and Culture",
issn = "1025-3866",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Researcher’s guilt

T2 - Consumption, Markets and Culture

AU - Mamali,Elizabeth

PY - 2018/5/30

Y1 - 2018/5/30

N2 - A reflexive approach to qualitative research seeks to uncover structures of inequality in the research encounter. On the surface, it would seem that ethnographic methods provide the conditions to alleviate this methodological instrumentalism. By employing a confessional account, this paper demonstrates how the paradox of asymmetrical rapport prevents ethnographic work from reaching its collaborative potential. Drawing from insights in an ethnographic enquiry in an arts charity, the author narrates the guilty experiences that arise when researchers reproduce a culture of commodifying informants. This is exemplified through impression management tactics that generate an illusion of mutuality, alternating with more authentic instances of co-participation. The implications of this self-perceived moral violation are discussed for the researched, the researcher and ethnographies of consumption more broadly. The paper contributes to the methodological literature by explaining the potential of confessional accounts as a tool to operationalise reflexive, reciprocal practice, counteracting the demands of a knowledge economy.

AB - A reflexive approach to qualitative research seeks to uncover structures of inequality in the research encounter. On the surface, it would seem that ethnographic methods provide the conditions to alleviate this methodological instrumentalism. By employing a confessional account, this paper demonstrates how the paradox of asymmetrical rapport prevents ethnographic work from reaching its collaborative potential. Drawing from insights in an ethnographic enquiry in an arts charity, the author narrates the guilty experiences that arise when researchers reproduce a culture of commodifying informants. This is exemplified through impression management tactics that generate an illusion of mutuality, alternating with more authentic instances of co-participation. The implications of this self-perceived moral violation are discussed for the researched, the researcher and ethnographies of consumption more broadly. The paper contributes to the methodological literature by explaining the potential of confessional accounts as a tool to operationalise reflexive, reciprocal practice, counteracting the demands of a knowledge economy.

KW - asymmetrical rapport

KW - confessional reflexivity

KW - ethics

KW - Ethnography

KW - fieldwork instrumentalism

KW - research reciprocity

KW - researcher’s guilt

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047951501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10253866.2018.1474109

DO - 10.1080/10253866.2018.1474109

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Consumption, Markets and Culture

JF - Consumption, Markets and Culture

SN - 1025-3866

ER -