Representations of a high-quality system of undergraduate education in English higher education policy documents

Paul Ashwin, Andrea Abbas, Monica Mclean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the ways in which a high-quality system of undergraduate education is represented in recent policy documents from a range of actors interested in higher education. Drawing on Basil Bernstein’s ideas, the authors conceptualise the policy documents as reflecting a struggle over competing views of quality that are expressed through pedagogic discourses. They identify two pedagogic discourses: a dominant market-oriented generic discourse and an alternative discourse that focuses on transformation. They argue that the market oriented generic discourse is dominant because it is more coherent and more consistently presented than the alternative discourse, which is much more fractured. In conclusion, they argue that refocusing the alternative discourse of quality around students’ relations to academic knowledge may offer a way in which to bring the different actors from the higher education field together in order to form a stronger, more cohesive voice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)610-623
Number of pages14
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volume40
Issue number4
Early online date18 Oct 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

discourse
education
pedagogics
market
student

Keywords

  • Higher education quality; inequality; policy documents; sociology; undergraduate students
  • Inequality
  • Students
  • consumers
  • policy documents

Cite this

Representations of a high-quality system of undergraduate education in English higher education policy documents. / Ashwin, Paul; Abbas, Andrea; Mclean, Monica.

In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2015, p. 610-623.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48339322bc5d4e29991e010e52830742,
title = "Representations of a high-quality system of undergraduate education in English higher education policy documents",
abstract = "This article examines the ways in which a high-quality system of undergraduate education is represented in recent policy documents from a range of actors interested in higher education. Drawing on Basil Bernstein’s ideas, the authors conceptualise the policy documents as reflecting a struggle over competing views of quality that are expressed through pedagogic discourses. They identify two pedagogic discourses: a dominant market-oriented generic discourse and an alternative discourse that focuses on transformation. They argue that the market oriented generic discourse is dominant because it is more coherent and more consistently presented than the alternative discourse, which is much more fractured. In conclusion, they argue that refocusing the alternative discourse of quality around students’ relations to academic knowledge may offer a way in which to bring the different actors from the higher education field together in order to form a stronger, more cohesive voice.",
keywords = "Higher education quality; inequality; policy documents; sociology; undergraduate students, Inequality, Students, consumers, policy documents",
author = "Paul Ashwin and Andrea Abbas and Monica Mclean",
note = "From the ESRC Funded Project RES-062-23-1438",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/03075079.2013.842211",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "610--623",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge Falmer",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representations of a high-quality system of undergraduate education in English higher education policy documents

AU - Ashwin, Paul

AU - Abbas, Andrea

AU - Mclean, Monica

N1 - From the ESRC Funded Project RES-062-23-1438

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article examines the ways in which a high-quality system of undergraduate education is represented in recent policy documents from a range of actors interested in higher education. Drawing on Basil Bernstein’s ideas, the authors conceptualise the policy documents as reflecting a struggle over competing views of quality that are expressed through pedagogic discourses. They identify two pedagogic discourses: a dominant market-oriented generic discourse and an alternative discourse that focuses on transformation. They argue that the market oriented generic discourse is dominant because it is more coherent and more consistently presented than the alternative discourse, which is much more fractured. In conclusion, they argue that refocusing the alternative discourse of quality around students’ relations to academic knowledge may offer a way in which to bring the different actors from the higher education field together in order to form a stronger, more cohesive voice.

AB - This article examines the ways in which a high-quality system of undergraduate education is represented in recent policy documents from a range of actors interested in higher education. Drawing on Basil Bernstein’s ideas, the authors conceptualise the policy documents as reflecting a struggle over competing views of quality that are expressed through pedagogic discourses. They identify two pedagogic discourses: a dominant market-oriented generic discourse and an alternative discourse that focuses on transformation. They argue that the market oriented generic discourse is dominant because it is more coherent and more consistently presented than the alternative discourse, which is much more fractured. In conclusion, they argue that refocusing the alternative discourse of quality around students’ relations to academic knowledge may offer a way in which to bring the different actors from the higher education field together in order to form a stronger, more cohesive voice.

KW - Higher education quality; inequality; policy documents; sociology; undergraduate students

KW - Inequality

KW - Students

KW - consumers

KW - policy documents

U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2013.842211

DO - 10.1080/03075079.2013.842211

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 610

EP - 623

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 4

ER -