Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Representation of Pain and Injury in Children's Picture Books—A Content Analysis

  • Dur E.Nayab Mehar
  • , Sue Nichols
  • , Abbie Jordan
  • , G. Lorimer Moseley
  • , Melanie Noel
  • , Sarah B. Wallwork
  • University of South Australia
  • University of Calgary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1   Link opens in a new tab Citation (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: Pain and injury experiences are common throughout childhood (e.g., minor injuries, vaccine injections) and provide important and frequent opportunities for children to learn about pain. Sociocultural contexts, such as reading picture books, may also provide critical opportunities for children to learn about pain/injury. This study aimed to investigate the representation of pain and injury in children's literature. Methods: We systematically screened for pain/injury representations in children's picture books, freely available from public libraries in South Australia. A content analysis of pain/injury representations was conducted on all included books. Results: Two hundred and fifty-four picture books were screened until 50 books with pain/injury representations were identified. There were 63 pain (i.e., subjective experience) and 43 injury (i.e., associated with tissue damage) representations. ‘Minor’ pains/injuries were frequently represented (n = 69; 86%), whereas ‘procedural’ (e.g., vaccine injections) (n = 1; 1%) and ‘chronic’ pain (n = 2; 3%) were not. Gender differences were observed where boy characters experienced more pain/injury incidents (n = 42; 53%) than girl characters (n = 23; 28.8%). Behavioural responses to pain/injury also differed, with girl characters being portrayed to experience more emotional responses (e.g., crying; n = 7; 77.8%) than boy characters (n = 2; 22.2%). Other characters present during pain/injury experiences were more likely to be passive bystanders (i.e., did not respond; n = 109; 59.6%) than active responders (n = 51; 27.6%) to characters experiencing pain. Conclusions: While the type of pain/injury representations in picture books seem consistent with young children's everyday pain/injury experiences (i.e., ‘minor’ pains/injuries), gendered stereotypes and dominant societal perspectives around pain and injury appear to be reinforced. Significance Statement: Shared reading of children's picture books provides an important sociocultural context for children to learn about pain and injury. In this study, we investigated how pain and injury are represented in children's picture books. We found that pain/injury incidents were consistent with young children's common pain/injury experiences; however, observing characters often lacked prosocial behaviours (e.g., helping, providing comfort) and gendered stereotypes were common. These findings have similarities to pain representations in children's popular TV/movies, speaking to the pervasiveness of these messages across children's media.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70102
JournalEuropean Journal of Pain
Volume29
Issue number8
Early online date13 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sept 2025

Acknowledgements

The authors have nothing to report. Open access publishing facilitated by University of South Australia, as part of the Wiley - University of South Australia agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • child education
  • children's picture books
  • paediatric pain
  • pain
  • sociocultural context

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Representation of Pain and Injury in Children's Picture Books—A Content Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this