Abstract
We investigate how religion concordance influences the effectiveness of preventive health campaigns. Conducted during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in two major Indian cities marked by Hindu–Muslim tensions, we randomly assigned a representative sample of slum residents to receive either a physician-delivered information campaign promoting health-related preventive practices, or uninformative control messages on their mobile phones. Messages, introduced by a local citizen (the sender), were cross-randomized to start with a greeting signaling either a Hindu or a Muslim identity, manipulating religion concordance between sender and receiver. We found that doctor messages increased compliance with recommended practices and beliefs in their efficacy. Our findings suggest that the campaign's impact is primarily driven by shared religion between sender and receiver, leading to increased message engagement and compliance with recommended practices. Additionally, we observe that religion concordance helps protect against misinformation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 102883 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Economics |
| Volume | 96 |
| Early online date | 9 May 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jun 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Authors
Data Availability Statement
The link to the replication package is https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/201306/version/V1/view;jsessionid=26E4BA4F6A8A389BC57165003A1EB299.Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Oriana Bandiera, Michael Callen and Maithreesh Ghatak, as well as seminar participants at the LSE-STICERD Development Economics seminar series and at IFS for helpful comments. This project would not have been possible without the insightful support of our partners in the field, Tatheer Fatima, Yashashvi Singh, Bhartendu Trivedi, and the field team of Morsel Research and Development. We are grateful to Julia Loh for outstanding research assistance. We are also indebted to study participants for their willingness to contribute to the study. This work was supported by the International Growth Centre [grant number IND-20077]; and the LSE Special Grant for Coronavirus Research [grant number 106404]. Kameshwara acknowledges support from the ESRC’s SWDTP Placement Scheme. Armand acknowledges funding from the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [grant numbers UIDB/00124/2020, UIDP/00124/2020 and Social Sciences DataLab – PINFRA/22209/2016], POR Lisboa and POR Norte [grant numbers Social Sciences DataLab – PINFRA/22209/2016]. Augsburg and Bancalari acknowledge support from the ESRC’s Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy at IFS [grant number ES/T014334/1]. Ethics approval was secured from the London School of Economics and Political Science [REC reference number 1132]. The pre-analysis plan was registered on the AEA RCT registry (Armand et al. 2020)UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Information
- Field experiment
- India
- Health campaign
- Religion
- COVID-19
- Communication
- Policy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Religious proximity and misinformation: Experimental evidence from a mobile phone-based campaign in India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS