Relative Age and Maturation Selection Biases in Academy Football

Megan Hill, Sam Scott, Robert M Malina, Darragh McGee, Sean Cumming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (SciVal)
79 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study examined the simultaneous effects of relative age and biological maturity status upon player selection in an English professional soccer academy. A total of 202 players from the U9 to U16 age groups, over an eight-year period (total of 566 observations), had their relative age (birth quarter) and biological maturity (categorised as late, on-time or early maturing based upon the Khamis-Roche method of percentage of predicted adult height at time of observation) recorded. Players born in the first birth quarter of the year (54.8%) were over-represented across all age groups. A selection bias towards players advanced in maturity status for chronological age emerged in U12 players and increased with age; 0% of players in the U15 and U16 age group were categorised as late maturing. A clear maturity selection bias for early maturing players was, however, only apparent when the least conservative criterion for estimating maturity status was applied (53.8% early and 1.9% late maturing in the U16 age group). Professional football academies need to recognise relative age and maturation as independent constructs that exist and operate independently. Thus, separate strategies should perhaps be designed to address the respective selection biases, to better identify, retain and develop players.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1359-1367
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume38
Issue number11-12
Early online date31 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Soccer
  • development
  • percentage adult height
  • puberty
  • talent identification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relative Age and Maturation Selection Biases in Academy Football'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this