Rejecting victims of misfortune reduces delay discounting

Mitchell J. Callan, Annelie J. Harvey, Robbie M. Sutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The derogation of innocent victims may bolster perceivers' implicit faith that the world is a just place. A key theoretical outcome of this faith is the ability to put aside smaller, short-term rewards for larger, long-term rewards. The empirical relation between victim derogation and participants' preferences for smaller-sooner versus larger-later rewards was examined in two studies using delay-discounting paradigms. In Study 1 (n=381), the more college students and Internet users derogated a victim of misfortune, the less they subsequently discounted larger-later rewards, but only when their faith in justice was threatened (perpetrators of the misfortune were unpunished). In Study 2 (n=238), informing Internet users that a victim was of bad (versus good) moral character decreased delay discounting. These results demonstrate that derogating victims of misfortune, although damaging to others, yields an important psychological benefit for the self by putting aside smaller-sooner rewards for larger-later rewards.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-44
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume51
Early online date11 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Reward
reward
faith
Internet
Aptitude
Social Justice
Delay Discounting
justice
Students
Psychology
paradigm
ability
student

Keywords

  • Belief in a just world
  • Delay discounting
  • Justice motivation
  • Victim derogation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Rejecting victims of misfortune reduces delay discounting. / Callan, Mitchell J.; Harvey, Annelie J.; Sutton, Robbie M.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 51, 03.2014, p. 41-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Callan, Mitchell J. ; Harvey, Annelie J. ; Sutton, Robbie M. / Rejecting victims of misfortune reduces delay discounting. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 51. pp. 41-44.
@article{fc59e7a93585466d96a36fddb714773d,
title = "Rejecting victims of misfortune reduces delay discounting",
abstract = "The derogation of innocent victims may bolster perceivers' implicit faith that the world is a just place. A key theoretical outcome of this faith is the ability to put aside smaller, short-term rewards for larger, long-term rewards. The empirical relation between victim derogation and participants' preferences for smaller-sooner versus larger-later rewards was examined in two studies using delay-discounting paradigms. In Study 1 (n=381), the more college students and Internet users derogated a victim of misfortune, the less they subsequently discounted larger-later rewards, but only when their faith in justice was threatened (perpetrators of the misfortune were unpunished). In Study 2 (n=238), informing Internet users that a victim was of bad (versus good) moral character decreased delay discounting. These results demonstrate that derogating victims of misfortune, although damaging to others, yields an important psychological benefit for the self by putting aside smaller-sooner rewards for larger-later rewards.",
keywords = "Belief in a just world, Delay discounting, Justice motivation, Victim derogation",
author = "Callan, {Mitchell J.} and Harvey, {Annelie J.} and Sutton, {Robbie M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "41--44",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rejecting victims of misfortune reduces delay discounting

AU - Callan, Mitchell J.

AU - Harvey, Annelie J.

AU - Sutton, Robbie M.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - The derogation of innocent victims may bolster perceivers' implicit faith that the world is a just place. A key theoretical outcome of this faith is the ability to put aside smaller, short-term rewards for larger, long-term rewards. The empirical relation between victim derogation and participants' preferences for smaller-sooner versus larger-later rewards was examined in two studies using delay-discounting paradigms. In Study 1 (n=381), the more college students and Internet users derogated a victim of misfortune, the less they subsequently discounted larger-later rewards, but only when their faith in justice was threatened (perpetrators of the misfortune were unpunished). In Study 2 (n=238), informing Internet users that a victim was of bad (versus good) moral character decreased delay discounting. These results demonstrate that derogating victims of misfortune, although damaging to others, yields an important psychological benefit for the self by putting aside smaller-sooner rewards for larger-later rewards.

AB - The derogation of innocent victims may bolster perceivers' implicit faith that the world is a just place. A key theoretical outcome of this faith is the ability to put aside smaller, short-term rewards for larger, long-term rewards. The empirical relation between victim derogation and participants' preferences for smaller-sooner versus larger-later rewards was examined in two studies using delay-discounting paradigms. In Study 1 (n=381), the more college students and Internet users derogated a victim of misfortune, the less they subsequently discounted larger-later rewards, but only when their faith in justice was threatened (perpetrators of the misfortune were unpunished). In Study 2 (n=238), informing Internet users that a victim was of bad (versus good) moral character decreased delay discounting. These results demonstrate that derogating victims of misfortune, although damaging to others, yields an important psychological benefit for the self by putting aside smaller-sooner rewards for larger-later rewards.

KW - Belief in a just world

KW - Delay discounting

KW - Justice motivation

KW - Victim derogation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889562646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.002

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.002

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 41

EP - 44

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -