Regional autonomy, spatial disparity, and ethnoregional protest in contemporary democracies

A panel data analysis, 1985-2003

Graham K Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper utilizes quantitative methods to examine the dynamics of ethnoregional protest in contemporary democratic states. The paper tests hypotheses relating the incidence of ethnoregional protest to the extent of regional autonomy, spatial disparity and ethnic demography. The findings suggest that relatively wealthy regions and those that are highly ethnically distinct from the rest of the country are more likely to experience ethnic protest, but that the relationship between regional autonomy and protest activity is more complex. Shared-rule features of regional autonomy have a straightforward and substantial dampening effect on the likelihood of ethnic protest, but self-rule features of regional autonomy can be both protest inducing—particularly in contexts of high ethnic distinctiveness and relatively low regional wealth—and protest mitigating, particularly in relatively wealthy regions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-66
Number of pages20
JournalEthnopolitics
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

protest
data analysis
autonomy
democracy
demography
Autonomy
Democracy
Panel Data
Protest
quantitative method
incidence
experience

Cite this

Regional autonomy, spatial disparity, and ethnoregional protest in contemporary democracies : A panel data analysis, 1985-2003. / Brown, Graham K.

In: Ethnopolitics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2009, p. 47-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d0d0d9413d3746d29711b0b576cfe398,
title = "Regional autonomy, spatial disparity, and ethnoregional protest in contemporary democracies: A panel data analysis, 1985-2003",
abstract = "This paper utilizes quantitative methods to examine the dynamics of ethnoregional protest in contemporary democratic states. The paper tests hypotheses relating the incidence of ethnoregional protest to the extent of regional autonomy, spatial disparity and ethnic demography. The findings suggest that relatively wealthy regions and those that are highly ethnically distinct from the rest of the country are more likely to experience ethnic protest, but that the relationship between regional autonomy and protest activity is more complex. Shared-rule features of regional autonomy have a straightforward and substantial dampening effect on the likelihood of ethnic protest, but self-rule features of regional autonomy can be both protest inducing—particularly in contexts of high ethnic distinctiveness and relatively low regional wealth—and protest mitigating, particularly in relatively wealthy regions.",
author = "Brown, {Graham K}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/17449050902738739",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "47--66",
journal = "Ethnopolitics",
issn = "1744-9057",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional autonomy, spatial disparity, and ethnoregional protest in contemporary democracies

T2 - A panel data analysis, 1985-2003

AU - Brown, Graham K

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This paper utilizes quantitative methods to examine the dynamics of ethnoregional protest in contemporary democratic states. The paper tests hypotheses relating the incidence of ethnoregional protest to the extent of regional autonomy, spatial disparity and ethnic demography. The findings suggest that relatively wealthy regions and those that are highly ethnically distinct from the rest of the country are more likely to experience ethnic protest, but that the relationship between regional autonomy and protest activity is more complex. Shared-rule features of regional autonomy have a straightforward and substantial dampening effect on the likelihood of ethnic protest, but self-rule features of regional autonomy can be both protest inducing—particularly in contexts of high ethnic distinctiveness and relatively low regional wealth—and protest mitigating, particularly in relatively wealthy regions.

AB - This paper utilizes quantitative methods to examine the dynamics of ethnoregional protest in contemporary democratic states. The paper tests hypotheses relating the incidence of ethnoregional protest to the extent of regional autonomy, spatial disparity and ethnic demography. The findings suggest that relatively wealthy regions and those that are highly ethnically distinct from the rest of the country are more likely to experience ethnic protest, but that the relationship between regional autonomy and protest activity is more complex. Shared-rule features of regional autonomy have a straightforward and substantial dampening effect on the likelihood of ethnic protest, but self-rule features of regional autonomy can be both protest inducing—particularly in contexts of high ethnic distinctiveness and relatively low regional wealth—and protest mitigating, particularly in relatively wealthy regions.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449050902738739

U2 - 10.1080/17449050902738739

DO - 10.1080/17449050902738739

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 47

EP - 66

JO - Ethnopolitics

JF - Ethnopolitics

SN - 1744-9057

IS - 1

ER -