Reflexivity and beyond – a plea for imagination in qualitative research methodology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, important as reflexivity is, it does not constitute the gold standard of qualitative research. Instead the author makes a plea for the use of sociological imagination. Design/methodology/approach – The paper makes use of data from the ISI Web of Science database to demonstrate the increasing popularity of the concept of reflexivity. Findings – All researchers exercise reflexivity in as much as carrying out research alters both the subject and the object of the research. Conscious reflexivity enables researchers to question their assumptions and consequences of their work but does not guarantee high quality research. For this, creative imagination in recognizing the creative possibilities afforded by the data, are essential. Originality/value – Arguing against the emerging orthodoxy of qualitative research methodology, the original proposal of this paper lies in its plea to relax methodological strictures and judge the quality of research pragmatically in terms of its scientific value and social usefulness.

LanguageEnglish
Pages332-336
Number of pages5
JournalQualitative Research in Organizations and Management : An International Journal
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatusPublished - 7 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Reflexivity
Qualitative research
Gold standard
Guarantee
Research quality
Exercise
Orthodoxy
World Wide Web
Usefulness
Design methodology
Data base

Keywords

  • Interpretation
  • Reflexivity
  • Research affordances
  • Sociological imagination
  • Standard qualitative doctoral thesis
  • Transcription

Cite this

@article{54af88c0908542afb9e2e0d879454457,
title = "Reflexivity and beyond – a plea for imagination in qualitative research methodology",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, important as reflexivity is, it does not constitute the gold standard of qualitative research. Instead the author makes a plea for the use of sociological imagination. Design/methodology/approach – The paper makes use of data from the ISI Web of Science database to demonstrate the increasing popularity of the concept of reflexivity. Findings – All researchers exercise reflexivity in as much as carrying out research alters both the subject and the object of the research. Conscious reflexivity enables researchers to question their assumptions and consequences of their work but does not guarantee high quality research. For this, creative imagination in recognizing the creative possibilities afforded by the data, are essential. Originality/value – Arguing against the emerging orthodoxy of qualitative research methodology, the original proposal of this paper lies in its plea to relax methodological strictures and judge the quality of research pragmatically in terms of its scientific value and social usefulness.",
keywords = "Interpretation, Reflexivity, Research affordances, Sociological imagination, Standard qualitative doctoral thesis, Transcription",
author = "Yiannis Gabriel",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1108/QROM-07-2015-1305",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "332--336",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management : An International Journal",
issn = "1746-5648",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflexivity and beyond – a plea for imagination in qualitative research methodology

AU - Gabriel, Yiannis

PY - 2015/12/7

Y1 - 2015/12/7

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, important as reflexivity is, it does not constitute the gold standard of qualitative research. Instead the author makes a plea for the use of sociological imagination. Design/methodology/approach – The paper makes use of data from the ISI Web of Science database to demonstrate the increasing popularity of the concept of reflexivity. Findings – All researchers exercise reflexivity in as much as carrying out research alters both the subject and the object of the research. Conscious reflexivity enables researchers to question their assumptions and consequences of their work but does not guarantee high quality research. For this, creative imagination in recognizing the creative possibilities afforded by the data, are essential. Originality/value – Arguing against the emerging orthodoxy of qualitative research methodology, the original proposal of this paper lies in its plea to relax methodological strictures and judge the quality of research pragmatically in terms of its scientific value and social usefulness.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, important as reflexivity is, it does not constitute the gold standard of qualitative research. Instead the author makes a plea for the use of sociological imagination. Design/methodology/approach – The paper makes use of data from the ISI Web of Science database to demonstrate the increasing popularity of the concept of reflexivity. Findings – All researchers exercise reflexivity in as much as carrying out research alters both the subject and the object of the research. Conscious reflexivity enables researchers to question their assumptions and consequences of their work but does not guarantee high quality research. For this, creative imagination in recognizing the creative possibilities afforded by the data, are essential. Originality/value – Arguing against the emerging orthodoxy of qualitative research methodology, the original proposal of this paper lies in its plea to relax methodological strictures and judge the quality of research pragmatically in terms of its scientific value and social usefulness.

KW - Interpretation

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Research affordances

KW - Sociological imagination

KW - Standard qualitative doctoral thesis

KW - Transcription

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947053501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QROM-07-2015-1305

U2 - 10.1108/QROM-07-2015-1305

DO - 10.1108/QROM-07-2015-1305

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 332

EP - 336

JO - Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management : An International Journal

T2 - Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management : An International Journal

JF - Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management : An International Journal

SN - 1746-5648

IS - 4

ER -