Abstract
This chapter presents my reflections on using Action Learning (AL) in Pakistani business schools, highlighting some of the challenges arising from the uncritical integration of Western approaches in non-Western contexts. I argue that critical discourses emerging from the West often neglect the historical and cultural legacies of the non-Western world, leading to unintended outcomes. During my reflection, I show several complexities in the use of AL's peer questioning (or Q insights), such as the negotiation of authority, group dynamics and gender power relations. My main argument raises questions for critical practices as articulated by the West and their integration within the Global South, as they paradoxically work to reinforce power relations through epistemic forms of colonisation. Towards the end of the chapter, I outline some implications for critical management education (CME) scholars and urge them to recognise local cultural practices in their own right, thus advocating the decolonisation of CME.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Research Handbook of Critical Management Education |
| Editors | Claire Rigg, Kiran Trehan |
| Place of Publication | Cheltenham, U. K. |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd |
| Chapter | 6 |
| Pages | 63-72 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781035308668 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781035308651 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Apr 2025 |
Keywords
- Action Learning
- Culture
- Global South
- Postcolonialism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Economics,Econometrics and Finance
- General Business,Management and Accounting
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘Reflecting-in’ and ‘reflecting-on’ action learning beyond Western ideals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS